Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Sculptorman t1_it7mdbr wrote

In the future it might be possible for artists to train the AI in their own unique style, meaning one artist can essentially clone themselves and be way more productive.

55

IM_INSIDE_YOUR_HOUSE t1_it7p8v1 wrote

But then once the artist is successfully cloned, what use does society have for the original artist?

28

BigZaddyZ3 t1_it7s3qr wrote

Good question. But I suppose that’s where copyright and intellectual property start to come into play…

−5

celestiaequestria t1_it8oooh wrote

Those systems only exist to protect those rich enough to hire their own elite squads of lawyers to enforce the laws, and the lobbying to get favorable versions of those laws written.

2

Niresque t1_it7q44j wrote

Disclaimer, I disliked AI-art in general.

The original artist would still be used to further evolve the AI, continuous training with more of the artists original works would be the only way the AI could "evolve" otherwise you only get a snapshot of their talent.

−6

CrazyC787 t1_it7qur4 wrote

Yall are giving way too much credit to the future of a fucking denoising algorithm lmfao

−4

[deleted] t1_it8rgzb wrote

[deleted]

2

CrazyC787 t1_it9obtl wrote

Pretty outraged.... 150 years from now, lol. Nice sci-fi cope

1

[deleted] t1_itb3nhu wrote

[deleted]

1

CrazyC787 t1_itgsepm wrote

And yet the rate of innovation has been slowing down the past decade. Moore's law is dead in the water, and the slow down is incredibly obvious if you compare the change in technology from 2000-2012 compared to 2012-2022. AI and a very small handful of other technologies are the only ones actually innovating at a rate consistent with how it was before.

1

Orc_ t1_iths09n wrote

> 150 years from now, lol. Nice sci-fi cope

I think it's somebody else who is trying to cope with a world moving too fast...

1

CrazyC787 t1_itjxb0v wrote

Okay you're right, it'll probably be more like 40-60 years from now lol.

1

stainfellow t1_it7vmn2 wrote

Profoundly dumb question. Are you going to take your kids crayons away because “society has no use for original artists?”

−8

comradejiang t1_it7mvq6 wrote

You could already do this with Stable Diffusion and uploading only your works to it.

5

Baron_Samedi_ t1_it8dayu wrote

A more interesting phenomenon is how AI art users are already making "deepfakes" in established artists' style. Tech savvy concept artists like Greg Rutkowski, who was conscientious about tagging his online art with clear descriptions, became overnight reluctant AI art gods. It remains to be seen if the glut of online art with his name attached will help or hurt their sales.

4

starstruckmon t1_it8q0jm wrote

The only reason he became popular is because he was the default example in the Disco Diffusion notebook ( where all this really started ) and people started copying from that. I don't know who came up with the tagging nonsense. There's thousands of other artists who have just as much work out there and their names produce just as consistent styles as Greg.

−2