Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j16w87q wrote

[deleted]

−42

Novadale t1_j16wqcu wrote

The people who were denied access were not involved in the lawsuit they just worked for the same company. It would be like being denied access to Wendy's because you worked at mcdonald's.

30

[deleted] t1_j16zhut wrote

[deleted]

−48

brickmaster32000 t1_j170gtn wrote

It's not different, your previous experience should have also been considered unacceptable.

31

TechNickL t1_j17258q wrote

What you're describing is already unacceptable. It's needlessly petty at best.

Besides, it's also different. This case is more like Pepsi refusing to sell to someone who once worked for an advertising firm that made a commercial for Coke. The person affected is not a Pepsi employee, nor have they done anything except their job. And that's still disregarding how weird/disturbing it is that MSG apparently has access to the facial recognition data to bar anyone working at specific companies and is allowed to use it at will.

15