The way this man can not turn down harming the environmentSubmitted by ActivatedFamiliar t3_ydl0mn in Pennsylvania
Janderss182 t1_itsua61 wrote
Reply to comment by LordFarquaad_theG in The way this man can not turn down harming the environment by ActivatedFamiliar
Yeah like nuclear energy predominately
LordFarquaad_theG t1_itsufaa wrote
Nuclear is not bad. But we need to diversify, can't rely on one source of energy.
Janderss182 t1_itsukr1 wrote
Cool. Most green energy sucks, is expensive, and is not efficient.
LordFarquaad_theG t1_itsuwm4 wrote
Not true. Solar, wind, geothermal, hydro are good non-dispatchable sources we can use to diversify.
[deleted] t1_ittduhs wrote
[removed]
throwaway60992 t1_itt8cqn wrote
You clearly are not an engineer…
Janderss182 t1_itsv6k1 wrote
Not true. We don’t even have batteries that are capable of banking most the energy we get from many of those forms of power
LordFarquaad_theG t1_itsvek3 wrote
Hence why they are called non-dispatchable. You need to have both dispatchable and non-dispatchable for true energy independence.
Janderss182 t1_itsvn69 wrote
dispatchable isn’t even a word lol
LordFarquaad_theG t1_itsw3j1 wrote
kiddestructo t1_itszq27 wrote
kiddestructo t1_itt1z6i wrote
You said green energy sucks. I gave you an example. It’s pretty simple..
Janderss182 t1_itt04j9 wrote
Ok cool. Don’t know what this really has to do with anything
OligarchWelfare t1_ittigle wrote
Green energy is cheaper than any but keep lying because that's what Republicans told you to believe
Janderss182 t1_itunuyw wrote
Actually it’s not but keep lying because you’re an ideologue and can’t think outside of what your bullshit political parties tell you to think
Janderss182 t1_itunwci wrote
Far from a republican bud
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments