Submitted by MadLove1348 t3_yx1qh0 in RhodeIsland
12stringPlayer t1_iwn2n40 wrote
Reply to comment by Rickshmitt in Why 95 exit changes? by MadLove1348
Not for me - I'll still be off Exit 1!
I'm waiting for the sign on 95S to change from "No Exit 4" to "No Exit 12 (old No Exit 4)
darthduder666 t1_iwnc2g6 wrote
Dude Exit 1 here too. Our exit falls around 0.4 miles. So technically our exit should be Exit 0 if they’re following the rounding rules. 😂
I was hoping they’d make it Exit 0 because that would just be badass.
12stringPlayer t1_iwncdcs wrote
I'd love to say "take exit zero" when giving directions!
darthduder666 t1_iwnd281 wrote
Right??? Total missed opportunity for the state.
Rickshmitt t1_iwn3fbb wrote
Lol. We will all bond over No exit 4. Also i think theres a local band by that name
kdex86 t1_iwo2qc6 wrote
I’m pretty sure any and all “no exit xx” signs were removed, as they were tied to a sequential system.
monkysandtools t1_iwsb2wy wrote
The last time I check "No Exit 17" is still up over at RT10
kdex86 t1_iwssp6x wrote
That could confuse drivers, as it’s between exits 33 and 35 now.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments