Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TerranceBaggz t1_j5lra8z wrote

Reply to comment by Blatmore in Lol, 85 minutes for the next bus is so pitiful. by MD_till_i_die

Yes you are very yikes. Go troll somewhere else.

around 15% of disabled people cycle

3

Blatmore t1_j5m3u9m wrote

Wow so you're ready to exclude 85% of disabled people?

0

TerranceBaggz t1_j5pxevz wrote

Wow you’re generalizing all disabled people which is the definition of ableist. While I simply said “it’s ableist of you to claim disabled people can’t ride bikes.” So I cited data that showed you were wrong, you doubled down and proved me correct, then since you knew you did, you goal post moved to yet another incorrect and easily disprovable position. Again, just go away troll.

2

Blatmore t1_j5qpzdc wrote

You said I was trolling, then you continued to try to argue. So I tried to be even more absurd.

I still say bike lanes are ableist. Particularly when 85% of disabled people can't use them.

1

TerranceBaggz t1_j5r0x78 wrote

Just because “only” 15% of disabled people cycle (actually surprisingly high IMO) doesn’t mean 85% of disabled can’t use bike lanes. That’s a logical fallacy and is easily proven wrong. People in wheelchairs and mobility scooters etc use them all the time to get around. In fact that was a primary motivator for the Big Jump on Druid Hill Lake Dr. I’ve seen plenty of disabled people using Maryland Avenue also. But if you never bike, and only ever drive around sheltered in a car, you don’t notice these things. Also, you are trolling. It doesn’t mean your stupid arguments aren’t worth swatting aside and disproving so that others can learn from your stupidity.

2

Blatmore t1_j5r3dxn wrote

You know, I never actually opposed bike lanes before, but you're so insufferably sanctimonious and condescending that I will now be a single issue voter: no bike lanes. In fact, I will now call them bike "lames" because of how lame they are.

1