Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

FreeQ t1_iw2k9a4 wrote

AI?

193

ApplesAreSweet t1_iw2ujqa wrote

Definitely, those teeth wouldn't be drawn like that by an artist.

127

apinanaivot t1_iw30c9n wrote

And the "objects" in the background make no sense.

63

TheStreisandEffect t1_iw3mg3s wrote

What are you talking about? It’s just a few white gimrets sitting under an open hibourd.

53

TikkiTakiTomtom t1_iw5jvj3 wrote

Just to fuck around with you I’m going to draw it exactly like that

2

tastycrust OP t1_iw33vf6 wrote

Yes. Image input is an anatomical skull. I'm currently using SD locally to train it on images in a slow attempt to lay the foundation for assistance in forensic reconstruction, and it ended up generating this. The skull that I used for this is from a 45 year old Chinese male. My hope is to be able to produce a fairly accurate "reconstruction" generator that will be cost effective and time effective with a minimum of 70% accurate likeness. This is a solo project because everyone I've pitched it to don't think it will work, but I know this is going to be the future, and I want to put this tech to good use and see what it can be capable of. I hope this works, to some effect because I have been looking at nothing but gore, forensic remains, cadavers and anatomical images for the last two weeks. My eyes need a break.

44

Ocioretro t1_iw369an wrote

It is a good idea. The bad thing about it is that, as you get it, if it's salable, an army of other people with high-end computers can beat you to it. I don't know you at all and I don't know if this advice will help you: sell the project as soon as you can, with that preliminary version you have to start. Sell and then perfect it.

18

Ocioretro t1_iw36ej0 wrote

Now another question. Did you give the skull back to that 45-year-old man? I have read that having a skull is necessary for life.

18

skylarmt_ t1_iw466bs wrote

A skull is not necessary, unless your use of "life" implies anything more than constant pain and horror.

7

adviceKiwi t1_iw3jhgf wrote

> Yes. Image input is an anatomical skull. I'm currently using SD locally to train it on images in a slow attempt to lay the foundation for assistance in forensic reconstruction, and it ended up generating this. The skull that I used for this is from a 45 year old Chinese male. My hope is to be able to produce a fairly accurate "reconstruction" generator that will be cost effective and time effective with a minimum of 70% accurate likeness. This is a solo project because everyone I've pitched it to don't think it will work, but I know this is going to be the future, and I want to put this tech to good use and see what it can be capable of. I hope this works, to some effect because I have been looking at nothing but gore, forensic remains, cadavers and anatomical images for the last two weeks. My eyes need a break

OK. That's actually quite cool. Gross. But def cool

3

No-Love-555 t1_iw6p6qe wrote

And so the retardation begins. Ugh, I'm so not excited to see where this all leads.

2

missjeany t1_iw5mrnb wrote

can AI generate this in STL? I would love to print some of this shit

−1