apinanaivot
apinanaivot t1_je50pdk wrote
Reply to comment by Beowuwlf in ChatGPT browsing mode plugin now available to certain users. by Savings-Juice-9517
Doesn't change what I said.
apinanaivot t1_je4d58k wrote
Reply to comment by iJeff in ChatGPT browsing mode plugin now available to certain users. by Savings-Juice-9517
Weird, GPT-4's biggest strength was said to be it's ability to use external tools proficiently unlike GPT-3.5.
apinanaivot t1_je24cio wrote
Reply to comment by Gab1024 in ChatGPT browsing mode plugin now available to certain users. by Savings-Juice-9517
What makes you think it isn't?
apinanaivot t1_j0ki6il wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Update of ChatGPT by Sieventer
OpenAI's CEO just tweeted yesterday that he wants to build a world with AI where working is optional for everyone. So I wouldn't accuse OpenAI of being too capitalist.
OpenAI doesn't currently have an infinite supply of resources, so they will need to charge users for their products.
apinanaivot t1_iy3qsa3 wrote
Reply to comment by earthsworld in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
> It's still a headset and no one is going to be leaving their house wearing one.
That's not the point of VR, which is for "escaping" the real reality. What you are describing would be AR (augmented reality).
> Nor will people be sitting around on their couch for hours doing the same.
There are literally tons of people right now who are spending more time in virtual reality than in actual reality, I recommend checking this video out. I personally have spent over 500 hours in VR, and the only thing stopping me from playing more right now is the shortage of high-quality VR experiences.
apinanaivot t1_iy3gavj wrote
Reply to comment by ZaxLofful in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
By directly suppressing the issue inside your brain. You could wear a similar BCI without the display part on a boat and use it to cancel out the sickness.
> The feeling can already be suppressed artificially. “It’s more of a certification issue than it is a scientific issue,” explains Newell.
Basically the problem has to do with ethics and safety when having a direct communication with the brain.
apinanaivot t1_iy3fypj wrote
Reply to comment by butterdrinker in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
Except thanks to new lens technology, that's no longer the case. The industry is moving from expensive fresnel lenses towards pancake lenses, the Quest Pro and Pico 4 headsets that were released a few months ago already feature such lenses.
The pico 4 costs 400€, and has a built-in mobile gaming computer, batteries and two 2K displays, there is no way the lenses cost anywhere near 200€, and on top of that the new pancake lenses fix all the issues frensel lenses had, such as terrible light glares, distortion, requiring thick headsets, and no adjustment options for people with myopia (now you don't need to wear glasses in VR anymore).
apinanaivot t1_iy3eda4 wrote
Reply to comment by ZaxLofful in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
Valve is working on BCI technology that will solve motion sickness issues, and increase the immersion further (eventually to the sci-fi / Ready Player One level)
apinanaivot t1_iy3e1w7 wrote
Reply to comment by butterdrinker in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
Camera tech is progressing very fast. You can now have a similar quality camera in a 200€ smartphone that you would have had in a 600€ camera 10 years ago. The resolution of camera sensors is also increasing at a steady pace. Lenses aren't really the bottleneck, so they don't need to be developed as fast.
apinanaivot t1_iy3dl9l wrote
Reply to comment by GuyWithLag in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
We are not likely going to skip VR / AR, but BCI's are definitely coming, and will replace VR once they do.
apinanaivot t1_iy3dgff wrote
Reply to comment by Freevoulous in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
Phones absolutely do not cover even a tiny fraction of the functions a proper AR headset would.
apinanaivot t1_iy3dd7g wrote
Reply to comment by GuyOnTheMoon in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
They probably meant BCI (Brain-Computer Interface)
apinanaivot t1_iy3d6ev wrote
Reply to comment by ZaxLofful in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
It absolutely does. Valve Index PPD (pixels per degree) is 13. The human eye is 57 PPD.
Also Valve Index is a really bad bencmark, the Index came out three and a half years ago, and some valve employees have said that it was already two years old technology when it shipped. So it's pretty much 5 year old tech by now. The upcoming Valve Deckard headset is rumoured to have two 4K displays, having almost three times higher resolution than the Index.
apinanaivot t1_iy2ylcz wrote
Reply to comment by For_Endor in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
By modern standards, really only 6DOF counts as vr, the earlier tech is more like 3D wearable monitors.
apinanaivot t1_iy2y0sg wrote
Reply to comment by Neurogence in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
We are currently in the valley of disappointment: https://i.imgur.com/f11ZDYf.jpeg
Same thing happened with the internet. In the early 90's people thought the internet would change the world very quickly, and were disappointed around 2000 when not much had happened, then in a few years some little companies and websites such as Google, Wikipedia, Amazon and Facebook popped up out of nowhere.
apinanaivot t1_ixw95jf wrote
Reply to comment by Shelfrock77 in Combination of ultrasound and nanobubbles destroys cancerous tumors by Shelfrock77
apinanaivot t1_iwcakdv wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Cultural Profile of r/singularity by Redvolition
Far left usually is, and so is far right in most cases.
apinanaivot t1_iw30c9n wrote
Reply to comment by ApplesAreSweet in Secret Menu (oc) by tastycrust
And the "objects" in the background make no sense.
apinanaivot t1_iuv3z4m wrote
Reply to comment by pisspoorplanning in Robots That Write Their Own Code by kegzilla
That's what I said.
apinanaivot t1_iushcm0 wrote
Reply to comment by TheSingulatarian in Robots That Write Their Own Code by kegzilla
To be fair, this doesn't yet reprogram itself. It creates generic human-like code to perform actions on a physical robot. It doesn't write machine learning algorithms.
apinanaivot t1_iuqe0xi wrote
You should also post this on /r/artficial
apinanaivot t1_iu38wm1 wrote
Reply to comment by innovate_rye in Teen Glues Hand To Historic Computer to Protest A.I. Takeover [satire] by canadian-weed
Also the text is probably mostly generated by GPT-3
apinanaivot t1_ittj1r0 wrote
Reply to comment by GenoHuman in Our Conscious Experience of the World Is But a Memory, Says New Theory by Shelfrock77
And even if it wasn't, it wouldn't make any difference since there is just one timeline.
apinanaivot t1_jeab61e wrote
Reply to comment by AdmirableTea3144 in Where do you place yourself on the curve? by Many_Consequence_337
Well it will be an s curve, the laws of physics will surely slow things down at some point.