Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_iydnreu wrote

>This is a friendly reminder to read our rules. > >Memes, social media, hate-speech, and pornography are not allowed. > >Screenshots of Reddit are expressly forbidden, as are TikTok videos. > >Comics may only be posted on Wednesdays and Sundays. > >Rule-breaking posts may result in bans. > >Please also be wary of spam. >

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

rell7thirty t1_iydp7ma wrote

Someone's gotta get to the bottom of this. Or should I say underside

10

nurgole t1_iydqu6z wrote

This is why I suck at creative things. I overthink things that aren't that important.

33

WhereIsHisRidgedBand t1_iyds3yu wrote

People think circumcision is no big deal but there are men who laborously spend time and energy stretching and growing a “fauxskin” r/Foreskin_Restoration

I guess american dads have a thing for the twinsies look.

−5

thorspeepee t1_iye4cnc wrote

None of these are funny... stop spamming reddit with this boring shit

−8

IcyClearly t1_iyedgix wrote

How does she come to the conclusion wolverine is not circumcised? Is it a (relatively) recent thing?

5

Ok_Whereas_Pitiful t1_iyejlak wrote

Replying to IcyClearly (#822,199)

I think widespread circumcision is relatively recent.

I think it is mainly a Jewish thing if I remember correctly. It would not surprise me if other cultures did it as well, but I am unsure if like the catholics, protestants, and/or quakers practiced circumcision.

5

Garmgarmgarmgarm t1_iyek5r5 wrote

Wow this was a trending post on r/marvel comics like 3 weeks ago but I guess OP of that post just copied your work to farm karma or something because your comic is way older

5

ReasonablyBadass t1_iyelud4 wrote

Hm. The body would register a circumcision as an injury. Wolverine doesn't have scar tissue either. But baby teeth fall out according to a biological clock, that wouldn't be seen as an inury.

33

AlloyComics OP t1_iyep2kt wrote

Replying to Garmgarmgarmgarm (#826,307)

Ahhh, then that's totally okay. I know that this has been discussed before. I only turned this into a comic because it's a real conversation I've had with my husband and my comic documents fun bits of our lives.

3

BeetleLord t1_iyerrq4 wrote

Really funny. Next let's talk about whether popular female characters have had their vaginas mutilated

2

Aboredgoat t1_iyf3vim wrote

Replying to BeetleLord (#831,100)

Yeah. Because men who had their genitals damaged do not want to tangle with the very psychologically harmful prospect of considering that they had their genitals damaged. So in the course of denial of their own damaged genitals, they damage the genitals of their sons, and the cycle repeats. Then there’s the ridiculous suggestion that young boys don’t pay enough attention to their dicks to be able to clean them if we don’t cut off pieces, and the pervasive view that “it looks better”, which is just a delightful reason to mutilate infants.

10

SeiCalros t1_iyfdr7r wrote

Replying to ReasonablyBadass (#825,236)

i dont think it would work like that

its not like the bodys various subsystems maintain awareness of how and why they interoperate

your body isnt really aware of its amputated parts regardless of whether or not theyve come out naturally - thats why they dont grow back

complete regeneration would mean that wolverines body must have some kind of schema keeping track of what body parts he SHOULD have - and a fairly generic schema since he aged beyond being a pubescent teen

if its something inherent and biological then it wouldnt matter if he had been circumcized - but the schema developed after infancy then circumcision might have stuck

17