Chicken_Water t1_izeza49 wrote
Manufacturers making cheaper planes with less redundancy. How did they know that's exactly what I wanted to fly in?
booschlatte t1_izfn5cd wrote
Where are you getting the reduced redundancy from?
Chicken_Water t1_izfrzhf wrote
4 engines down to 2. The article also literally states they cheaper to make and references the reduction in engines.
Enchelion t1_izftana wrote
The newer planes can fly on 50% engine capacity just as the 747 could. Having 4 isn't necessarily better redundancy if you still need two working to fly.
Chicken_Water t1_izg7seh wrote
I thought I recalled the 747 only needing 1 engine to fly and land in an emergency. If I am remembering wrong and you're correct that it requires two, then I'd agree with you.
booschlatte t1_izg5zws wrote
Yeah that’s not a reduction. The number of engines has nothing to do with redundancy or safety.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments