Submitted by Dense-Spinach-1901 t3_10whjej in jerseycity
hxc-ufoz t1_j7ncvvc wrote
They're at the age where you can't legally retaliate, which sucks but it means you have to be careful. I'm a tall, somewhat imposing man, and even still dude. When I see a raucous crowd of teenage boys I don't know, honestly I will sometimes cross the street.
I remember being that age. They're shit heads and it's easy for a group of friends to egg each other on into doing bad things.
It sounds like you did the right thing OP. All you could have done to retaliate was bark at them, say that you'll call the cops -- maybe they'd disperse, but if anything, you're just increasing the risk to yourself and your girl of being harmed.
In a position like that you do whatever you can to help her feel safe. It can't hurt to use your voice at least, but beyond that the move is definitely to exit the situation as quickly as possible.
Laraujo31 t1_j7phefj wrote
If you feel that your life is in danger and they start hitting you, you are within your right to defend yourself. That does not mean pull out a gun and start shooting though.
noodle_spam t1_j7o0003 wrote
>They're at the age where you can't legally retaliate
I sincerely don't understand that. If a bunch of thugs attack you, how comes you don't have legal rights to retaliate to defend yourself? Why there age matter, especially if you can't say if they are 17 or already 18? Hell, even if you know for a fact they are 16? They still can damage, rape or kill you.
I think what you are saying is misinformation. Can you quote a law?
hxc-ufoz t1_j7pebk2 wrote
Without spending my morning digging through the state statutes — minors in general are granted special protections under the law.
If the encounter really got out of hand, how can he prove he was provoked? And not only that, but sufficiently provoked to warrant an adult striking a minor.
See where this is going? You can bet a judge and jury will have little sympathy for someone who has physically maimed a child. I wouldn’t expect his fellow inmates to look highly on such behavior, either.
The letter of the law isn’t all that matters
AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j7p1ypm wrote
TIL Kyle Rittenhouse moved to JC.
Mysterious-Change954 t1_j7p8bxy wrote
TIL defending yourself from harm is considered controversial.
Finesseer t1_j7pgngc wrote
Just roll over and get beat up by a gang of high schoolers, you pansy
AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j7pydxh wrote
Make one little joke about a guy's post history and all of the insecure little shits come out of the woodwork.
You sound triggered jerkoff, nobody is rolling over. Fact is the odds we're against this guy.
All that happened was some words said and some shit thrown at them. Not fun but also better than ending up in the hospital, the morgue, jail, in a lawsuit, or even sitting in your house with a black eye.
He did the right thing by not engaging.
There's nothing but downsides to it. If you beat up a bunch of kids, you beat up kids. If you get beaten up, you got your ass kicked by a bunch of kids. Both scenarios because even though you're a grown ass adult, you've got a fragile ego that can't handle mean words.
You don't know WHY they're baiting you. Maybe one has a gun or a knife or there's a bunch of their friends down the block with baseball bats.
Hustle up and GTFO of there, you're not getting a check at the end of that fight. As long as no one gets hurt, who fucking cares?
If they grab you, then beat their asses, but that's not what happened here so shut your pie hole and go live your revenge fantasy somewhere else.
Finesseer t1_j7qdf6x wrote
You can pretend I'm a gaggle of high schoolers and run away now.
AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j7rzp7z wrote
You must be new here.
[deleted] t1_j7v652i wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments