Submitted by CactusBoyScout t3_11eh6dj in movies
FloppedYaYa t1_jae4p73 wrote
Reply to comment by SaltySteveD87 in Awards Without Gender Categories? Celebrities Debate by CactusBoyScout
Hope you're not implying that the reason for this is men being better actors
IamRick_Deckard t1_jae5hd0 wrote
It's been talked to death about how men get better and more interesting parts.
FloppedYaYa t1_jae5y03 wrote
That's not true at all in 2023
Syn7axError t1_jaeajfh wrote
Even if all sexism disappeared tomorrow, men would have a three thousand year back catalogue of real soldiers, emperors, scientists, etc. to work with, and those are the kinds of roles awards love.
FloppedYaYa t1_jaedfql wrote
It's really a bit staggering how comfortable people on this site are with being misogynistic
CactusBoyScout OP t1_jaec29e wrote
Someone in the NYTimes comments cited a database that tracks this and only 17% of leading roles in movies go to women.
mrand01 t1_jaerbex wrote
The comment you're referencing: "Per the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media: 17% of top grossing films had a female lead"
You left out the "top grossing" part, which would certainly skew your claim.
CactusBoyScout OP t1_jaerp6n wrote
True. They have to use some kind of criteria though otherwise every indie movie and self-made film would have to be counted. And the “top grossing” ones are what matters most for someone’s career and for awards show recognition.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments