Submitted by SquatOnAPitbull t3_zzcf7k in movies
theprophetquasimodo t1_j2ascvl wrote
Reply to comment by LoveEffective1349 in Was Bruce Willis in Die Hard the ushering in of the modern everyman action star? by SquatOnAPitbull
An everyman more handsome than every man
LoveEffective1349 t1_j2at52c wrote
like Bruce Willis wasn't already a sex symbol ? He was already a "heart-Throb" because of moonlighting.
theprophetquasimodo t1_j2atrf9 wrote
Interesting. What set it apart for me was the beautiful head and body of hair.
Sexy-off: Willis v Reynolds. Two titans of the hunk industry, this needs to be settled.
NorthernerWuwu t1_j2bue89 wrote
Tom Selleck saunters by, chuckling to himself.
underbloodredskies t1_j2d3itl wrote
While Sam Elliott relaxes in the corner with a beer...
TylerBourbon t1_j2b8mzc wrote
Interestingly though, that wasn't a boon in his cap at the time. He was a "heart-throb" sure, but it was for a comedic tv role in a comedy drama show. Not exactly a role that screams action movie star, so there was actual concern by many at the time about whether or not people would go see him in a movie.
FormerIceCreamEater t1_j2bwm1w wrote
He isn't naturally attractive. If Willis walked into a room and wasn't famous, people wouldn't say he was a handsome man. If burt Reynolds did, people would say that
bravetailor t1_j2e2mb3 wrote
That's why I'd put Hackman above everyone else as the quintessential everyman. Balding, not really good looking (but not ugly either), doesn't do martial arts or anything, a guy you might miss in a crowd but when you see him close up there's an underrated aura of strength to him.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments