Submitted by SquatOnAPitbull t3_zzcf7k in movies
LoveEffective1349 t1_j2at52c wrote
Reply to comment by theprophetquasimodo in Was Bruce Willis in Die Hard the ushering in of the modern everyman action star? by SquatOnAPitbull
like Bruce Willis wasn't already a sex symbol ? He was already a "heart-Throb" because of moonlighting.
theprophetquasimodo t1_j2atrf9 wrote
Interesting. What set it apart for me was the beautiful head and body of hair.
Sexy-off: Willis v Reynolds. Two titans of the hunk industry, this needs to be settled.
NorthernerWuwu t1_j2bue89 wrote
Tom Selleck saunters by, chuckling to himself.
underbloodredskies t1_j2d3itl wrote
While Sam Elliott relaxes in the corner with a beer...
TylerBourbon t1_j2b8mzc wrote
Interestingly though, that wasn't a boon in his cap at the time. He was a "heart-throb" sure, but it was for a comedic tv role in a comedy drama show. Not exactly a role that screams action movie star, so there was actual concern by many at the time about whether or not people would go see him in a movie.
FormerIceCreamEater t1_j2bwm1w wrote
He isn't naturally attractive. If Willis walked into a room and wasn't famous, people wouldn't say he was a handsome man. If burt Reynolds did, people would say that
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments