Submitted by J7eTheGorilla t3_122iz1h in newhampshire
NHiker469 t1_jdqkf3f wrote
Reply to comment by NeedleworkerNo8029 in Newmarket - THC in the ice cream. Get it while it lasts! by J7eTheGorilla
They served their customers contaminated ice cream. They need to be shut down as well.
NeedleworkerNo8029 t1_jdql5er wrote
That makes no sense. Do you think a grocery store should be shut down every time there’s a recall on one of their products?
rahnster_wright t1_jdrfqrv wrote
This person is trying very hard to convince us. Chipotle didn't go out of business when people got salmonella from the lettuce. It wasn't Chipotle's fault.
NHiker469 t1_jdqnbsi wrote
Totally different
NeedleworkerNo8029 t1_jdqne3w wrote
How is it different?
NHiker469 t1_jdqnicm wrote
You had one job. It was to serve untainted ice cream. You failed miserably. Better luck next time.
NeedleworkerNo8029 t1_jdqnmag wrote
How were they supposed to know it was contaminated?
NHiker469 t1_jdqocxu wrote
That’s the problem. There were so many ways for them to double check and cross check what they were serving to their customers for ingestion. Instead, they just took their word for it.
Anyone example of accepted mediocrity.
“Someone else will do it.” “Someone else’s problem”.
Fuck outta here. If you serve THC laced ice cream to your customers you need to be shut down.
NeedleworkerNo8029 t1_jdqookn wrote
What are you talking about? What ways? It was mislabeled by the manufacturer who made it for personal use. Why would the store even consider THC laced ice cream being a possibility to look out for?
NHiker469 t1_jdqotn4 wrote
They served ice cream laced with drugs to their customers. There is a no excuse. They need to be shut down.
NeedleworkerNo8029 t1_jdqp2sc wrote
Thankfully most customers can use logic and will see you have no argument. I’m sure the store will be fine.
NHiker469 t1_jdqp7fj wrote
Ha. Doubtful. For starters, anyone with a child will never go here again.
jwiggler t1_jdqr9av wrote
You can be nuanced in your argument, you know. Like, theres a case for forcing the store to get a new distributor or to employ a new process to test their ice cream due to theor tangential responsibility here
But you're just jumping to shutting them down, and you're kinda coming off cranky and unreasonable because of it.
NHiker469 t1_jdqrlbn wrote
No. They need to be shut down.
Apparently it was one tub of ice cream from the processor.
Ever play the game “one of these doesn’t look like the other”.
It sounds like there was absolutely no process for double checking anything, let alone single checking.
You can’t serve drug laced food to your customers and be expected not to shut down. Period. Hard stop.
beyond_hatred t1_jdqwzur wrote
There is no reasonable expectation that a retail store would test all incoming vendor-supplied ice cream for THC content.
You might as well expect your supermarket to be testing for THC in gallons of milk.
NHiker469 t1_jdqxh5u wrote
I have a reasonable expectation not to be served ice cream laced with drugs.
Say that out loud.
beyond_hatred t1_jdr39q6 wrote
OK, we've established that you think you're right already.
NHiker469 t1_jdr3qsu wrote
*know I’m right.
This place is toast. Anyone with a child or who doesn’t want drug in their ice cream won’t come here again.
Too many other options of place that won’t serve you ice cream laced with drugs.
jwiggler t1_jdqs7jk wrote
I see you have that opinion. I don't agree.
But you should send an email to your representative because it's obvious you feel so strongly.
NHiker469 t1_jdqsqiq wrote
Funny you say that. I have already began composing a letter for local and state reps. Especially those who want to legalize cannabis.
They should take note of how these people feel and how they and their lives were impacted.
jwiggler t1_jdqtl0w wrote
Sure, if you feel that way, you should totally do that.
Btw I'm smoking a doobie writing this comment how you feel about that
NHiker469 t1_jdqunia wrote
That’s awesome!! Good for you.
But this is how I know you’re a dunce. You can’t tell the difference between choice and not.
You chose to smoke that “doobie”….it want given to you under the guise of ice cream. Silly goose
jwiggler t1_jdqvnnt wrote
I didn't choose to smoke this Doobie. You forced it upon me. The state I'm from, doobies are legal. And they force everyone to smoke them, especially if it's infused with ice cream. There's no regular ice cream where I live, only Doobie infused ice cream. And they force you to eat it.
Stop the legalizing of marijuana. They will put it in your kids food. In the water. You will be perpetually high on that Doobie-gas. If we don't stop this, America will surely fall to the socialist liberals who want to infect our kids with doobie.
I will never go to that ice cream place again.
NHiker469 t1_jdqvxt5 wrote
More copy pasta. I’m sorry. I didn’t read past the first line.
BomTradyBT21 t1_jdqzit3 wrote
If you can’t have an adult conversation, why don’t shut the fuck up, Karen.
Someone asks a valid question about the giant gap in your logic, and you just ignore it and default back to “shut everything down”.
NHiker469 t1_jdr077u wrote
LOLOL…Tom Brady handle. Says I’ll I need to see.
BomTradyBT21 t1_jdr23bn wrote
Oof. Guess your sense of humor is as lacking as your intellect.
SnooPeripherals5969 t1_jdql5r0 wrote
So If you bought a bag of chips from a gas station and the chips were tainted… you would expect the gas station to shut down as well as the manufacturer of the chips? That makes no sense. They had no way to know.
NHiker469 t1_jdqnkyd wrote
You had one job. Serve your customers ice cream. Instead you have them THC. Big time fail. Better luck next time.
Matryoshkova t1_jdqubwx wrote
So you expect an ice cream shop to have a drug testing lab and regularly test their product for drugs? That makes no sense.
NHiker469 t1_jdquulu wrote
Def not. But it’s clear there are no standards here.
Shut down. Try again later.
No one is going to go here anymore, so my opinion is moot.
TwinTtoo t1_jdqvoc6 wrote
Should all good and products in all stores be checked for THC despite the integrity of the packaged or label says? Why stop testing only at ice cream
NHiker469 t1_jdqw1xz wrote
Well, you don’t need to check my new pair of Nike for cannabis.
But I’d like to know that when I take my kid for ice cream ITS NOT LACED WITH FUCKING THC.
What a dumb thing to say.
Matryoshkova t1_jdqyf1w wrote
Then I guess you can’t take your kids to any restaurants anymore because you can’t reasonably expect any restaurant to be testing their food for drug contamination. In fact, you’re going to have to fully grow your own crops and raise your own animals because it’s all the same government agency making sure your groceries and restaurant food aren’t being laced with drugs.
NHiker469 t1_jdqygya wrote
You’re still talking?
Matryoshkova t1_jdqymzo wrote
You’re still answering? Look I can be a bitch, too ☺️
NHiker469 t1_jdqytej wrote
I’m just flipping over here between my emails. It’s easy to laugh at you defending this with walls of text no one will read and then going back to composing my emails to my representatives.
Matryoshkova t1_jdqw4xx wrote
The health department will deal with the restaurant, they will have an investigation and will determine if the owner of the restaurant has any expectation to have known about the distributor lacing their product. Single restaurants can’t go and inspect their distributor’s facilities, there is separate FDA oversight, so there generally is no reasonable expectation of a restaurant having oversight of the way a distributor is making their products. Restaurant owners choose distributors based on publicly available health and safety department information and sometimes because they have a good relationship with a rep from the company. it is a failing of governmental oversight that this distributor was able to mix a batch of personal-use laced ice cream in with ice cream set to be sent out, not on the restaurant owner who is using information from the government to make a determination if a distributor is trustworthy.
NHiker469 t1_jdqwb01 wrote
Another copy pasta I didn’t read past the first line.
Keep an eye out. They will be closed. You can’t serve illegal drugs to your customers. Sorry.
Once the authorities confirm there were fail safes in place, it’s game over.
Matryoshkova t1_jdsqf9y wrote
You are the internet equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears and yelling “lalalalala” when someone proves you wrong
NHiker469 t1_jdsslzw wrote
Negative. I just know when I’m right. The Reddit hive mind is a spectacular phenomenon.
I’d love to share screen shots of the group chats I’m in with all these parents.
razor_sharp_pivots t1_jdr4sxz wrote
What should they have done differently? How would you have caught this?
NHiker469 t1_jdr5ikq wrote
It’s called due diligence. Know who you’re getting your product from. Know what their processes are. Ensure there are checks and double check.
You know, so you don’t serve your clients ice cream laced with drugs.
The “pass the buck” mentality is atrocious on this one.
razor_sharp_pivots t1_jdr5q23 wrote
Give a specific safeguard you would have used to prevent this. Otherwise quit trolling. You don't have any suggestions as to how this could have been avoided. You're just here to rage on the internet about nothing.
NHiker469 t1_jdr61ba wrote
I said, GOOD DAY ma’am.
BlobAndHisBoy t1_jdqlf94 wrote
Yeah, why didn't they test their ice cream for THC before selling it like every other ice cream shop? Reckless and egregious, I am outraged.
NHiker469 t1_jdqnejk wrote
Stupid take lol
Matryoshkova t1_jdqudu6 wrote
That is what your take is sounding like, genius
NHiker469 t1_jdqv25w wrote
In your opinion. Im in a group chat with with all the parents from my children’s school (who chose to be in the chat). It’s interesting how their take is nearly the same as mine
This place is done, as they should be.
captain_falc25 t1_jdqznad wrote
That literally is YOUR take that you keep spamming up and down this thread
NHiker469 t1_jdr0a9e wrote
Just my own comment. No worries. They will be shut down soon enough.
BlobAndHisBoy t1_jdsb9h1 wrote
How do you think they could have prevented this? What precautions are others taking that they didn't?
WhoWhatWhereWhenHowY t1_jdql8y3 wrote
That makes no sense.
besafenh t1_jdr3vev wrote
You earned a downvote.
If I bought E. coli contaminated spinach from Hannafords should the farmer, packer, distributor, or Hannafords be liable? As that’s potentially deadly, should everyone at Hannafords be jailed? Warehouse packers to truck drivers. Produce department kids working after school, to store management:
“YOU HAD ONE JOB”.
Or is the responsibility upon the farmer and co-packer instead? Did you knowingly harvest a flooded crop? Did you knowingly pack questionable product, and commingle various products in violation of batch control?
Did one problematic crop of spinach result in a nationwide recall of ALL fresh greens distributed through normal channels?
It was a great week for local farmers, as they weren’t subject to recall.
E. coli O157:H7 (2006)
NHiker469 t1_jdr4o3k wrote
Sorry. Does anyone read replies that long? I don’t.
You served me THC in my ice cream. You will be shut down.
Pretty cut and clear.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments