Submitted by DietCokeMachine t3_yop5oa in newhampshire
ItsMeFergie t1_ivhvq75 wrote
Reply to comment by JayBisky in Question 2 - "Shall there be a convention to amend or revise the constitution?" by DietCokeMachine
Apparently all humans are men then.
Shirt-Medium t1_ividf6m wrote
They are synonymous in the constitution are they not? what would you replace?
ItsMeFergie t1_ivig44g wrote
I'm not going to get too deep into my own political beliefs. But I believe changing "All men" to "All people" is very appropriate. It's not even a woke issue just very old outdated terminology of a document written WAY before women had the right to vote. However I will still be voting no. Who know what other bullshit EITHER party would try to pull and with the current political climate of the nation no fucking way is it worth the risk. Synonymous can also be subjective.
NickTz20 t1_ivjscen wrote
Wants to be created equally, but doesn't want to break a nail in construction jobs.
ItsMeFergie t1_ivk17wk wrote
Wants to be superior but doesnβt deal with a period every month hormonal shifts and popping kids out of them. But you pop off king. You dropped this π
NickTz20 t1_ivk1i0u wrote
That's your rebuttal πππ. I can assure you more men bleed daily than women.
ItsMeFergie t1_ivk1o2b wrote
Not sending a real rebuttal because an internet stranger isnβt going to change your mind. Not worth the effort. I feel sorry for the women in your life.
NickTz20 t1_ivk1uwb wrote
Oh I didn't see that response coming π. I'll let them know you're sorry for them.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments