Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

V1198 t1_j1d0f8s wrote

Not even a good Governor. Can only ride his last name so far, he’s peaked, someone who cares about him ought to tell him 😂

8

V1198 t1_j1ensn4 wrote

My personal favorite is how he f_cked up the work from home income tax situation post Covid. He’s a Republican, Governor of Massachusetts was a Republican…but could he make a deal? Nope. Instead he launched a doomed to fail lawsuit and cost NH workers money.

5

Rixtertech t1_j1eo562 wrote

Your post was downvoted to zero. I just poked it up to One but that probably won't last long. I've gotten pretty much the same response when I've tried to bring up the issue of Sununu's ambitions. I think he either has one of those reputation-management firms or possibly just his trumpy howler monkeys voting down any outbreak of these discussions. Why he/they are afraid of public discussion is a bit of a mystery, maybe he wants his "people" to frame all such talk? I dunno, but he'll try to break out of the local scene into the national at some point, you can count on it. And hopefully fail.

−1

Rixtertech t1_j1eva2d wrote

What makes you think I've got a candidate? At this point I'd like to get Chris "My ego is bigger than yours" Sunlooney and Maggie "To Hell With a Living Wage For You Peasants" Hassan in the same elevator. The one with the frayed cable.

−2

prestigious_delay_7 t1_j1if1ms wrote

This is an incredibly stupid take.

  1. Why would Baker have accepted half of what thought he could get? There's hundreds of millions of dollars at stake.
  2. Just because they're in the same party doesn't mean they don't have diametrically opposed goals. Sununu is responsible to his constituents in NH, a group that does not want to pay income taxes. Baker is responsible to his constituents in MA, a group that does not want to lose substantial tax revenue to fund it's social programs.
  3. If Sununu accepted half, that would piss off his own constituents even more. You either believe you are in the right and take it to court, or you don't. He did, and the SCOTUS declined to take up the case.
0

V1198 t1_j1igeeo wrote

  1. Because it’s better than the NOTHING he walked away with
  2. Seems to be part of being a politician for the effective ones anyways
  3. I’m a constituent. Half would have been better than nothing.

What a stupid response.

0

Rixtertech t1_j1k97kg wrote

> You immediately elevated a candidate not getting as many votes as you expected to a conspiracy theory.

"Elevated" some candidate? A Conspiracy Theory? I hope someone has some idea what you're talking about... good luck with that and Merry Xmas Whiskey Tanqueray! Wait a minute... is this Don Bolduc?

1