Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

who519 t1_jdvl2mn wrote

Do it. This is the most powerful revolutionary tool in a modern capitalist country. We Americans think that we can fight a tyrannical government with guns (spoiler alert, your AR15 isn't going to stop a bunkerbuster dropped on your house), but a general strike is the weapon the ruling class fears the most.

23

mobileagnes OP t1_jdw75s1 wrote

The problem here in the US is people really bought that whole 'temporarily embarrassed millionaires' thing hook, line, & sinker.

13

Odd-Employment2517 t1_jdwudj1 wrote

The thing is any armed rebellion in the US would effectively be about killing the economy which is how it could possible effect change. Mercifully no one other than insane lunatics like the 6JAN folks actually want to see America as a nation ruined in that way

2

tkp14 t1_jdygfl2 wrote

The stand up routine by comedian Neal Brennan (currently on Netflix) has an hysterical bit about a contest between 100 average Americans with all their weapons and 1 guy in the U.S. military . It is truly laugh out loud funny.

2

robexib t1_jdvo651 wrote

A bunker buster on a house would immediately delegitimise a government both domestically and abroad. An armed population can do a lot more than an unarmed one in that instance.

−12

who519 t1_jdw000m wrote

Yet another person who has watched too many movies. The elite love you guys, they feed you bullshit all day long and you can't get enough. Look at Russia, they have done much worse than bunker bombs on their neighbors and send their own citizenry into the meat grinder without training or weapons. A tyrannical government will do whatever they hell it wants and your peashooter isn't going to stop them. And though I repeat this line ad nauseam on Reddit, your gun is far more likely to hurt you or someone in our family than to save you. Every study has shown this. let go of the fantasy.

The real weakness of any government is economic production. If nobody goes to work and people stop buying specific goods, the government literally grinds to an immediate halt. Sad to say but a general strike combined with boycotts are your greatest weapon, not as cool as a John Wick movie, but far more realistic.

5

robexib t1_jdw12iy wrote

Who the fuck expects the flair of a John Wick movie!

1

who519 t1_jdw1lvx wrote

John Wick, Rambo, Red Dawn take your pick, all fantasies just like fighting against the greatest military ever equipped and assembled with your AR-15. Have an upvote for the sense of humor though!

4

Epicbaconsir t1_jdwibz0 wrote

And how are these strikers going to defend themselves when the government sends the jackboots in? The reality is if we really wanted to overthrow the government we’d need a combination of both. The problem is we’re nowhere near the level of organization necessary for either one to happen.

0

who519 t1_jdwkks0 wrote

Are they going to send Jackboots to every single person's house? The beauty of a general strike is you just stay home, you don't even have to gather in the streets. Sure they may send a few groups to make people leave their houses, but they can't do that for the entire country. If you tried to fight them with peashooters, you are going to get massacred. They have cruise missiles, Apache gunships, tanks, chemical weapons, etc...etc...if they are truly a tyrannical government like Russia, they will just kill everybody whether they have a gun or not. But if they have no one to run the factories or feed the army, or keep trade afloat, they are literally powerless. It renders military aggression completely impotent.

Edit: Look what Russia has done to the very well armed citizenry of the cities of Ukraine, they have blown them to shit. The cities are rubble. The military of Ukraine and the equipment being donated to them by the West is what is keeping them in the war, not a bunch of their citizens taking pot shots with AKs.

4

Adonwen t1_jdvx58j wrote

After what Russia is still able to do after invading a sovereign nation, nah not really lol.

2

robexib t1_jdw0vmn wrote

You mean when Russia invaded a nation that had recently disarm themselves? That one?

−4

Adonwen t1_jdw258h wrote

Those nukes were controlled officially by the CIS or in other words - the Russian state.

Also - Russia broke the following upon invasion:

"The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used."

2