Submitted by Superbuddhapunk t3_107x920 in news
SunsetKittens t1_j3pammb wrote
Other nations already got space covered. Instead do the oceans Britain. There's a ton we could do there a lot to still explore and nobody seems in a hurry to do it.
cboel t1_j3ps26c wrote
Plenty of nations are exploring the ocean and have been doing so for quite a while now. It's just that the ocean is so huge, they've barely been able to scratch the surface.
For those interested, check out this channel on YT:
https://www.youtube.com/@oceanexplorergov
blisstaker t1_j3psc6q wrote
did i just read a comment correcting someone about a discussion on britain that the oceans have been being explored for awhile
cboel t1_j3pts3x wrote
Informing yes, correcting no. OP is still correct saying greater ocean exploration is needed.
I also think the UK could contribute to space exploration and that it's not necessary to think a failure should lead to a complete abandonment of a lot of talented people working hard in that area of science.
But that's just me. Thanks for the previous downvote Far Cry fan.
blisstaker t1_j3q55y3 wrote
ok u dont get the joke about the british exploring the high seas for almost all of global history prior to modern times
what’s the far cry reference? i only played like five minutes of the first one
cboel t1_j3rvato wrote
Bliss is part of Far Cry 5's storyline. [Bliss]taker lol
fighttodie t1_j3px9u5 wrote
It's not just about exploring it's about inhabiting. If we could live under water that would free up a lot more space. Plus be cool. Maybe a good way to hunker down in bad weather too.
JohnPlayerSpecia1 t1_j3qodqr wrote
it is harder to construct a big enough living space under the ocean water pressure than a vacuum in space. the trick is getting there.
cboel t1_j3rvgn3 wrote
Yeah. There's that too.
Agent_Angelo_Pappas t1_j3qswmw wrote
Water is a hostile environment for humans. We’re better off trying to keep our surface environment safe than we are trying to move to one we never evolved to live in.
[deleted] t1_j3soxk7 wrote
[removed]
Rawrsomesausage t1_j3pf9pv wrote
This 1000x. If we spent more of the resources in the ocean rather than space, we might know a bit more than the 5% currently charted.
nosferatWitcher t1_j3qhkay wrote
Virgin Orbit is an American company
metametapraxis t1_j3sppd3 wrote
Not sure why you got a downvote, 'cos it is true.
[deleted] t1_j3pb437 wrote
[removed]
JohnPlayerSpecia1 t1_j3qo6yv wrote
the British already did the ocean when it was commonwealth and with its east Indian company.
SkunkMonkey t1_j3qt1lg wrote
Only the surface though. There's a lot more under that.
[deleted] t1_j3rbzyy wrote
[removed]
wart_on_satans_dick t1_j3t6kfi wrote
How far we talking, like ten feet?
[deleted] t1_j3v1jfn wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3r6wr0 wrote
[removed]
Captain_Mazhar t1_j3rnozf wrote
Britannia rules the waves!
[deleted] t1_j3safh8 wrote
[removed]
DecreasingPerception t1_j3ryjux wrote
Britain has a pretty prosperous space sector. It was only due to American shenanigans that we stopped launching orbital rockets ourselves. I don't think Air Launch is a good solution but having some domestic access to orbit is probably good for the industry as a whole.
[deleted] t1_j3san1y wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments