Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Der_Schubkarrenwaise t1_j28oj6n wrote

A place committed to better the relations between genders not only turns a blind eye to more severe gender issues(sexual harassment) but allows spying on those who try to complain about them? Pretty ironic to go through such lengths just to arrive in a 60s style work environment.

33

GoBillsGoSabres t1_j292z5w wrote

>just to arrive in a 60s style work environment.

You didn't need to do shit to hide anything in the 60's. Sexual harassment literally did not exist. You hid the bastard you had with the secretary you were openly fucking. You didn't hide the acts.

10

Jack071 t1_j296a4l wrote

Always beware the people that seem to do the hardest effort to show how much they support any stance, they are usually either extremist or fake

7

Kind_Bullfrog_4073 t1_j291tdw wrote

Hopefully she sexually harrassed both genders equally.

27

otirk t1_j29lxp0 wrote

At least they knew what they were talking about

7

curiouscabbage69 t1_j28eyn8 wrote

This isn't oniony

−20

Fetlocks_Glistening t1_j28j9c0 wrote

The director was described by former employees as an “uninhibited” exhibitionist who on occasion would strip down to “her bra or her thong” in the open office space, the Volkskrant reported.

They detailed how Darmoni allegedly kissed people without permission on their heads, or would grind against them during mandatory dance sessions.

They described that she started weekly meetings by forcing workers to participate in belly dancing.

“Most of us thought that was terrible. Sometimes Kaouthar pressed her breasts or buttocks against you while dancing. If someone said something about her behavior, she would laugh at you squarely,”

This is in the institute whose aim is the promotion of safe workspaces. And gender equality. Forced belly dancing? Stripping to thongs in open plan offices?

I don't know, how more oniony could it be - introduce black leather boots and flogging? We're already at montyphythonesque levels here.

32

curiouscabbage69 t1_j28m45q wrote

Sexual harassment and gender equality aren't the same thing

−19

thomasp3864 t1_j29xidc wrote

Sure, but a lot of the stuff she did is so over the top like the fact it was at mandatory dance sessions, that were it not a gender equality institute it would still be oniony.

6

Key_Island5631 t1_j2f6brt wrote

Sexual harassment in the workplace is objectively a "safe workplaces" issue, so it's already oniony for that, but furthermore, regardless of your personal opinion, it is typically considered a gendered issue by institutes like these. That's why it's so oniony.

1