Comments
curiouscabbage69 t1_j28eyn8 wrote
This isn't oniony
Arkeyzann t1_j28hxj2 wrote
Ironic at best
Fetlocks_Glistening t1_j28j9c0 wrote
The director was described by former employees as an “uninhibited” exhibitionist who on occasion would strip down to “her bra or her thong” in the open office space, the Volkskrant reported.
They detailed how Darmoni allegedly kissed people without permission on their heads, or would grind against them during mandatory dance sessions.
They described that she started weekly meetings by forcing workers to participate in belly dancing.
“Most of us thought that was terrible. Sometimes Kaouthar pressed her breasts or buttocks against you while dancing. If someone said something about her behavior, she would laugh at you squarely,”
This is in the institute whose aim is the promotion of safe workspaces. And gender equality. Forced belly dancing? Stripping to thongs in open plan offices?
I don't know, how more oniony could it be - introduce black leather boots and flogging? We're already at montyphythonesque levels here.
curiouscabbage69 t1_j28m45q wrote
Sexual harassment and gender equality aren't the same thing
Der_Schubkarrenwaise t1_j28oj6n wrote
A place committed to better the relations between genders not only turns a blind eye to more severe gender issues(sexual harassment) but allows spying on those who try to complain about them? Pretty ironic to go through such lengths just to arrive in a 60s style work environment.
Kind_Bullfrog_4073 t1_j291tdw wrote
Hopefully she sexually harrassed both genders equally.
GoBillsGoSabres t1_j292z5w wrote
>just to arrive in a 60s style work environment.
You didn't need to do shit to hide anything in the 60's. Sexual harassment literally did not exist. You hid the bastard you had with the secretary you were openly fucking. You didn't hide the acts.
Jack071 t1_j296a4l wrote
Always beware the people that seem to do the hardest effort to show how much they support any stance, they are usually either extremist or fake
otirk t1_j29lxp0 wrote
At least they knew what they were talking about
Fetlocks_Glistening t1_j29u0cv wrote
Pretty sure bosses publicly stripping down to thongs in open space offices wasn’t the done thing in the 60s either
thomasp3864 t1_j29xidc wrote
Sure, but a lot of the stuff she did is so over the top like the fact it was at mandatory dance sessions, that were it not a gender equality institute it would still be oniony.
curiouscabbage69 t1_j29xxod wrote
thomasp3864 t1_j29y0w7 wrote
Mandatory dance sessions
curiouscabbage69 t1_j29ywwq wrote
Yes, weird. Not related to gender equality though.
Der_Schubkarrenwaise t1_j2a44e1 wrote
That's right. Sadly.
person749 t1_j2aa0sq wrote
ContextIsForTheWeak t1_j2b5lzm wrote
>"her bra or her thong"
Not and???
Fetlocks_Glistening t1_j2cibit wrote
I know, right? We urgently need that video camera evidence to, umm, confirm proper grammar here
Key_Island5631 t1_j2f6brt wrote
Sexual harassment in the workplace is objectively a "safe workplaces" issue, so it's already oniony for that, but furthermore, regardless of your personal opinion, it is typically considered a gendered issue by institutes like these. That's why it's so oniony.
curiouscabbage69 t1_j2fdmuo wrote
Yeah, I can kind of see the link. Fine, I will concede this one.
masters_of_disasters t1_j28cz1f wrote
Never get high off your own supply.