Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

johnsolomon t1_j4cnati wrote

So what, are these kids gonna get punished if they clap a buddy on the shoulder after winning a game or hug a friend when they're down? Sounds like they're just going to foster some really socially awkward teenagers

Additionally, I could understand it if it was a primary school, but doing it in a secondary school is a bit weird. Putting general physical contact aside, I don't even see how they can stop romantic relationships forming in a school jam-packed with hormonal teenagers xD Well, good luck, I guess

14

epistemic_epee t1_j4elpv8 wrote

>So what, are these kids gonna get punished if they clap a buddy on the shoulder after winning a game or hug a friend when they're down? Sounds like they're just going to foster some really socially awkward teenagers

No.

>Students are not allowed to touch each other whilst on site. The only exceptions will be in Performing Arts, sporting activities and PE lessons, when this is required. This will help to create a calm and orderly atmosphere and ensure that there is no confusion about play fighting or anything more serious.

While the internet is largely against the policy, the parents seem to be really for it. I'm somewhat curious what led up to this.

6

free_umi t1_j4fbpoz wrote

TWO schools in England. It made the BBC News because it is so exceptional and different. However, FOX news reporting on point as ever.

12

NemosGhost t1_j4nwdyg wrote

It's literally in the first fucking sentence of the Fox article.

Get a grip.

−1

Yotsubato t1_j4df87d wrote

This will sure help fertility rates and make for well adjusted adults.

9

ThePu55yDestr0yr t1_j4g4fx7 wrote

That’s kinda a creepy angle to look at this regarding school kids lol

3

Gh0stMan0nThird t1_j4dgmgl wrote

My middle school had the same policy and I don't think it negatively impacted anyone outside of annoying the hell out of us.

2

mantawoop t1_j4fhutx wrote

I read the BBC article, not the Fox one and.... this sounds horrible. The official statements are worse than the headline. This will not go towards healthy relationships, it's going to create awkward people afraid of contact.

7

[deleted] t1_j4e8c39 wrote

In a few years they will also ban music and dancing. I smell a footloose sequel!

5

MetricVeil t1_j4etgof wrote

This is the most asinine approach to teaching children about, consent, personal space and behavioural boundries that I have ever seen. :|

3

BigGreenBallOfLuck t1_j4dyxmu wrote

Cue everyone in school all holding all the time. Don't tell us what we can and can't do. Cancerous Tories.

1

MrSquigles t1_j4fximy wrote

Two schools.

Misleading headline from scummy propaganda website.

1

NemosGhost t1_j4nwkrm wrote

It's in the first sentence of the article.

Lighten up Francis. The BBC article says exactly the same things as the Fox article.

0

9sandturbos t1_j4in61b wrote

We were not allowed to hug the opposite gender, and no hand contact more than 3 seconds with the opposite gender.

1

JackPThatsMe t1_j4egi92 wrote

But honestly considering how British people are with physical intimacy and showing emotion how much of a problem was this or would it ever be?

−3

Ovalgel t1_j4dhyr9 wrote

Now you know why 1776 happened.

−4

NewbiwanKenewbi t1_j4cokdi wrote

..but it's a democracy, right? The people made their choice

−22

fortnitefunnies3 t1_j4dkvse wrote

I don’t remember going to the polls to vote on this. This issue was decided by a small group on the school board, if that.

6

swisscriss t1_j4cgob2 wrote

Mashallah, school is for learning. All these types of things though seemingly innocent have dangerous consequences. Look at how the world is today, tell me you think it is heading in the right direction

−41