I feel it to be a justifiable question though I understand it’s a controversial one. To attack the thought of saying the underdog side is responsible without even justifying without offense is dancing around the point. We can’t just accept truth for what it is without explaining why.

It seems that your thought process is “people who are tasked to sustain and maintain public health/safety are not to blame if they decide to stop working due to unfair working and compensation conditions.” If we cut cops’ salaries and a significant number of them quit resulting shortage in staff or they all go on strike, and opportunistic criminals take advantage do whatever they want, do we still blame whoever is in charge of allocating budget for the cops salary instead of the actual individuals who quit?