Gigglefluff7 t1_jebsguf wrote
Take it.
It could open up other opportunities. Social. Career. Financial Etc.
Why don't they want you to move out?
You know eventually you will have to live on your own right. So would 42 or 60 per year make living on your own harder or easier.
adzling t1_jec29uh wrote
^ this
thealimo110 t1_jecd1e8 wrote
A lot of people advocate for moving out whenever possible, but it doesn't make sense for a lot of people.
The question should really be flipped; instead of asking people why they don't want to move out, I think the following question should be asked of people whl do want to move out if they don't need to, "Why do you want to move out and waste money on rent, extra living expenses, etc instead of saving money for a down payment, etc?"
For people who have good relationships with their family, there's no value to moving out, especially if they haven't saved up a down payment.
blueboot09 t1_jechzwq wrote
>"Why do you want to move out and waste money on rent, extra living expenses, etc instead of saving money for a down payment, etc?"
On a house I assume? Someone who is young and has flexibility can make moves and continue to increase pay and job position. Buying a house isn't the end all at this point, considering she's coming straight out of her parent's home. It has nothing to do with good relations w/parents. Socializing, networking, and being independent has value, especially at the beginning of a career. Get a small apt. or rent a room with another professional. Paying for a roof over your head and expenses isn't a waste of money. It's the next phase of life.
thealimo110 t1_jecu66d wrote
I think you're missing the point. They can buy a small condo instead of rent a small apartment. When it no longer suits them, rent it and move to the next property. What you're advocating is an unnecessary spending of tens of thousands of dollars per year, essentially for no value other than independence.
If OP works (whether remotely or not), they can socialize and network just as easily from an apartment or their parent's home.
As mentioned earlier, the only loss is the supposed value of independence. Your life experiences have led you to formulate your opinion on the value of that. My experience and what I've seen from higher net worth people around me is that people with assets tend not to go this route, and think that the value of this independence is overvalued.
Again, I'm not saying to stay home forever, or to live at home at the expense of moving out of the area for better career prospects. I'm saying that if a person can live for free at home without much sacrifice, it makes sense to me until they can live in an asset and not a liability.
[deleted] t1_jeddulu wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments