Submitted by APettyJ t3_11z45t3 in philadelphia
rndljfry t1_jdcvq6t wrote
Reply to comment by NoREEEEEEtilBrooklyn in SEPTA hopes new vertical gates will deter turnstile jumpers by APettyJ
Sure, and "reported" is obviously a huge consraint on that number.
At $2.50 per evasion and $925,000 for two stations' worth of gates, it seems like it's going to take a long time to recoup this investment.
AbsentEmpire t1_jdd72g4 wrote
The investment is more about keeping the problems that fair jumpers bring into system out of the system. The homeless drug addicts smoking crack on the subway drive away multiple more users than just their one fair.
rndljfry t1_jdd7tly wrote
>The homeless drug addicts smoking crack on the subway drive away multiple more users than just their one fair.
The thing about someone who can pull together enough money for a score is that they can pull together enough money for a fare if it gets them on the train for unlimited time.
AbsentEmpire t1_jdds7xf wrote
Yep, which is also why SEPTA needs to start kicking them off the system.
randym99 t1_jdd7los wrote
To be fare (ba-dum-tsh), that math isn't factoring any increase in ridership SEPTA might expect to experience from improving conditions on the trains (by say deterring homeless etc. from living in stations / on trains)
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments