Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

tabshiftescape t1_iu2yslj wrote

Lisa Murkowski is one of the last good ones.

4

Avalon-1 t1_iu2zhlu wrote

The only difference between her and trump is that she's polite.

0

Brilliant_Surprise54 OP t1_iu305pg wrote

And she doesn’t claim a rigged election or claim hoaxes. And sees The insurrection for what it actually was. She real not some follower. I’m not a right wing by any means nor left but this type of down to earth honesty is why she earns my vote

6

tabshiftescape t1_iu3389g wrote

And she’s voted more with Biden during his presidency and Obama during his presidency than she voted with Trump. And she’s known as one the of the most moderate Senators currently in office, which we desperately need right now.

3

Avalon-1 t1_iu33c6m wrote

she voted with Trump over 70% of the time. Actions speak louder than words, and was more than happy to pal along with Bush/Cheney even though they ran a successful Jan 6 (Brooks brothers riot).

But hey, she talk about "muh decorum/democracy!" so all is forgiven.

0

Brilliant_Surprise54 OP t1_iu33i7g wrote

With trump or with her affiliated Political Group and the other 30% is when that group went a little whacko and she stayed true to her constituents and views.

1

Avalon-1 t1_iu33kyh wrote

So, Typical GOP, just keeping the Quiet Part Quiet. Much like John "I hate the gooks!" McCain and Mitt "47% don't matter!" Romney.

1

tabshiftescape t1_iu300b6 wrote

Even though that would be a meaningfully important distinction in today’s GOP, I don’t think I agree.

Why do you think she’s the same as Trump, just polite?

2

Avalon-1 t1_iu33ecg wrote

Her voting Record. It's like John McCain's, in that they both talk big about "muh democracy/decorum!" but fall in line when it comes to action.

1

tabshiftescape t1_iu350lg wrote

And she’s voted with Biden 73% of the time. She was one of only two Republican senators who voted with Obama more than 70% of the time across his presidency.

She’s grown increasingly moderate over the past ten years and consensus building is absolutely what we need in this country right now. She, along with Congresswoman Cheney stood up against the party line for the insurrection on Jan 6 (the events of which were a far cry from those of the Brooks Brothers Riot which you compared them to in another comment). That in itself may be a terminal decision for their political careers. It’s integrity.

You don’t have to like her politics or her voting record. But as far as the GOP goes she’s one of the last ones sticking to her guns.

2

Avalon-1 t1_iu35kkb wrote

The Brooks Brothers Riot actually stole an election, but it was more a Romney/McCain style steal where they could keep a mask of "decorum".

and "integrity" amounts to "I'm as cruel as Trump/Bush/Cheney but more polite about it." and no amount of "joe Biden's smile is wholesome presidential chungus!" changes that.

And as for Liz Cheney, she is not someone to worship. She wanted to keep forever wars going on, and was a fan of torture, and voted far more in line with Trump than Murkowski. They want the same things as Trump, just in a more polite package.

0

tabshiftescape t1_iu362ro wrote

When we disagree on facts I don’t think there’s productive conversation to be had. My personal recollection of the Brooks Brothers Riot and that of every account of it I’ve found in the past couple minutes searching to refresh my memory indicates the only impact was that a few bureaucrats and the media was kept out of where the ballot counters were working. Unless you distrust what the ballot counters were doing, the election remained intact.

Instead of attacking individuals, maybe it’d be more productive to argue for the dismantling of the electoral college.

1

Avalon-1 t1_iu3am3h wrote

I was referring to the brooks brothers riot disrupting the recount in miami dade to the extent that bush was declared to win florida by 538 votes.

1

tabshiftescape t1_iu3ax7n wrote

What did that disruption look like?

1

Avalon-1 t1_iu3az6a wrote

1

tabshiftescape t1_iu3dkh8 wrote

Yeah okay I see. That’s the account I’m familiar with. It admits a stretch on the comparison between what happened on January 6th 2021 and November 19th 2000. Look I’m not saying that the Brooks Brothers Riot wasn’t interference, im just saying (like Business Insider) that its effect wasn’t impactful. That’s all.

1

rossxog t1_iu2yn5b wrote

How you know it was conservatives that posted it? Could have been independents. Could be some democrat trickery. Could have been you!

2

AutoModerator t1_iu2y7ip wrote

It looks like this post is about Politics. Various methods of filtering out content relating to Politics can be found here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1