Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

lowesburritos t1_itvr9g1 wrote

A reanimated monster that can't communicate and a creature that subsists by feeding on the essence of the living. This couldn't be more accurate.

92

Boring-Rhubarb t1_itvumin wrote

You can read into this as deep as you want. I kinda like the witch who interacted with fetterman is happy, where as the pirate who interacted with Oz is a tad disgruntled.

Good cover though, I like it.

80

lowesburritos t1_itvx26z wrote

Reading even further. The witch received candy. What she wants, but not what is necessarily good for her. The pirate received a carrot. Not want he wanted, but what he needs...

What does it all mean???

−36

Goggles_Greek t1_itw2h9g wrote

Pretty unbelievable premise, why would Oz be handing out anything in a state he doesn't live in?

311

JAK3CAL t1_itw9mpu wrote

Haha I went the same. The witch got her free candy. It isn’t actually good for her, but she wanted it. The pirate got the carrot… which you can take as “working towards” a carrot, healthy, etc. it is definetly Not what he wanted but in the long run it’ll be the best for him.

Super meta 😆 probably just a cartoon.

−6

Fever017 t1_itweaby wrote

Fetterstein!!!! 🔩

5

shrinkwrappedmummy t1_itwel7z wrote

why isn't Oz handing out his miracle diet pills. I'm sure they would help cut the lbs off these kids from snacking on sugary candy

12

wookiedookiedoo t1_itwg4zd wrote

Oz should be handing out untested, non FDA approved weight loss supplements in the picture.

237

JamesKLOLk t1_itwguau wrote

In the actual book, “the monster” isn’t actually the monster at all, society is the monster for perceiving him that way and he is fairly articulate. But I shouldn’t surprised that an ableist like yourself doesn’t read.

40

brendannnnnn t1_itwlb9t wrote

I can't wait until one day you're disabled in some way (which will happen to all of us) and people on the internet call you a reanimated monster that can't communicate. Bizarre.

Edit: This is a crazy idea, but let’s not be ableist against someone who literally just had a stroke.

−8

BigHugeTime t1_itwnqtn wrote

Only a tad bit, the part about needing it vs wanting it is interpretation… but the part about vegetables and candy and the kids reception is not.

But it’s also a political cartoon, to brush aside something so blatant as just someone’s interpretation is either disingenuous or mind blowingly ignorant.

−6

SomeoneSaysHi t1_itwozqs wrote

I didnt think too closely at first, and my glasses were off. Thought “ Neat. Looks like they are being really inclusive having a same sex couple on the magazine”

Then I put my glasses on and realized that it was a cartoony election guide.

I hope I didn’t open a can of worms for fettermam/oz fanfic.

88

Post_Efficient t1_itwsf2b wrote

I love that Fetterman is wearing shorts 👌

27

ClammyHandedFreak t1_itx09s1 wrote

Can confirm, I care more about Halloween candy than who the next dude to embarrass me will be.

2

WhyHulud t1_itx168p wrote

We're giving him a pass because he's actually done things to help people. We tend to like that, and it makes us want to let people have a mulligan now and then.

9

pittbiomed t1_itx4j6g wrote

Sounds like a bunch of birthers complaining when every candidate has to fulfill bare minimum residency requirements

−23

WhyHulud t1_itx8yua wrote

>I don't think Fetterman is a stand up person AT ALL.

You're going to go on to support a "Doctor" that spent years selling prima facie quack cures and remedies, but Fetterman isn't a stand up guy? Honestly I should just stop my reply here, with your maximum ingenuity. Complete trash person.

>that was sad and hard to watch last night. The reality is, he is not capable of this position in his current condition.

I'm sure if you watch a guy word vomit for 3 minutes, then turn to his opponent who is reading this babble from a teleprompter for a 15 second rebuttal it's going to look bad. Oz had neither substance nor merit in his answers. Oz was just talking as fast as he could to make it hard to respond. At least John sounded bad because he's recovering from a stroke, what's the excuse for Oz?

>Fetterman needs to be home recovering, not running for political office.

I agree. So Mehmet should just concede and we can have a new race for May.

>He simply cannot do the job in this state. His cognitive ability just isn't there.

If that's the case, he can re-sign after we send Mehmet packing.

>The thing is, if this happened to a Republican opponent, the left would be calling for them to step down 24/7 until they did so. Hell, they constantly were calling for mental evals on Trump to determine his suitability. But Fetterman is fine??? 🤦🏻‍♀️

John had a stroke. This is temporary. Trump takes too much Ritalin and can't control his bowels from all the cocaine. Trump literally suggested we nuke hurricanes. He still spouts about 3 lies a minute. He cries about what a loser he is. John has trouble putting words together while his brain recovers. It's not the same.

12

Bacon_boy86 t1_itxabuh wrote

I don't support either of them. Quit assuming any legitimate criticism of fetterman means you're voting for Oz. Jesus.

After a stroke the majority of recovery happens in the first six months. Fetterman is likely permanently brain damaged. It's crazy to me how people are acting like he is okay to be in a position of power. He can't form coherent sentences most of the time for fuck sake. And he straight up lies, like about supporting fracking. If you think Oz shouldn't run then you're fucking nuts if you think fetterman should.

The fetterman situation is one of the strongest demonstrations of tribalism on the left. You'd literally vote for a 4 year old if they ran as a D.

−13

zooline t1_itxf0t6 wrote

Yikes, there is no way this artist would take a jab at aphasia. Entirely more likely it's cos Fetterman is a big guy, Frankenstein's monster and is a good balance to a vampire .

17

violetgay t1_itxqmng wrote

I did not catch who this was supposed to represent and I was like, "omg are these boyfriends fueding about what to give out to kids on Halloween? Cute!" whoopsie

76

phantomtails t1_itxzsie wrote

(Not-so) fun fact: the company that publishes the Butler Eagle bought Pittsburgh City Paper in 2016. The editor of City Paper resigned last week because the Eagle refused to disclose that they were publishing the Post-Gazette while its staff was on strike, leading to a conflict of interest in their reporting.

31

Steven_Snippert t1_ity1eiq wrote

If only they still had a comment section to discuss the cover.

3

scamden66 t1_ity392q wrote

Why didn't they give Fetterman a costume?

−7

jfk_one t1_ityu283 wrote

2 clowns for a clown world

−5

pittbiomed t1_itzd860 wrote

Oh I get it , city paper showing their political bias. Imagine that

−8

Ok-Personality-1048 t1_itzmbqy wrote

Inaccurate. Republicans would never be so generous to other people's children. Unless there was some sort of tax incentive for themselves.

3

wagsman t1_itznvgv wrote

That’s just lazy. Everyone knows it was EUA, then fully authorized.

Sure you’re trying to make a dog at the EUA, but his supplements didn’t even get that far.

10

pittbiomed t1_itzrnd7 wrote

That’s sad. Clearly one is handing out candy that kids love , one is handing out stuff kids would hate to get for Halloween . It’s subtle but always some bias around anything like this

0

lowesburritos t1_iu008iy wrote

Maybe it represents a ring? When worn on the index finger it reflects confidence, self esteem, and leadership qualities.

Duh, of course I’m not serious. It’s a cartoon magazine cover for shits sake. Lighten up, pal.

0

KatyPerrysBoobs2 t1_iu06bro wrote

Imagine going trick or treating and Oz opens the door. You’d have to figure out how you somehow got to New Jersey.

3

Figgy1983 t1_iu0ddgd wrote

I take it this takes place at Oz's mother in law's house.

1

pittbiomed t1_iu0j926 wrote

Lol nice try , the kids hate healthy snacks so if they were given out by the vampire I would agree with you .but they love the candy given by the monster , hence a little play on the bias of the paper.

0

jtpro02 t1_iu0l3lm wrote

Lmao, your just so into this idea that vegetables are bad so that means they are saying Oz is bad. I think you must have some super anti vegetable bias or something.

1

pittbiomed t1_iu1kxvw wrote

But they sure do know what makes them happy in this instance and surprise, it’s candy ! And I agree kids do not know the benefits of veggies at that age .

1