Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_iv8ez3a wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are now allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will continue to be removed and our normal comment rules still apply to other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

buck54321 t1_iv8stco wrote

What is HF? It's not actually in the article's title, and it doesn't appear used in the article.

Using acronyms doesn't make you look smart. It just wastes other people's time.

26

L7Death t1_iv8thd4 wrote

Heart failure. The article talks about heart failure, repeatedly.

> "[I]nclusion of some ALA-rich foods, such as walnuts, in the diet of any individual, whether they have HF or not, might translate into [cardiovascular] benefits, besides the putative effect on [heart failure]," Sala-Vila said, according to Medscape.

It's also found in the article.

7

rosesincedar t1_iv9lmd5 wrote

You don't need to be plant based to reduce HF, just cut out crap foods.

−1

Craven-Raven-1 t1_iv9ua8o wrote

Maybe I'm dumb, but could it be because plant diet eaters are more conscious of their health?

7

liberal_meateater t1_ivaiis5 wrote

The only problem is, omega3 can be found in animal based foods.

And to think it might have an overall effect on outcomes regardless of the cause of heart failure ( NICM, ICM, valvular disease, PHT etc,) tells me it’s probably a poorly designed study that looked to favor plant based foods.

Funded by Seventh Day Adventists possibly?

−3

lookylookylulu t1_ivh9y53 wrote

I think the studies how animal fats affect the human body have been around for some time and are sound. Essentially I'm saying it common knowledge and has been for a long time.

My mother-in-laws father was a neurologist back in 20s, 30s and 40s. When she was a child she could remember that her father would never allow them to eat fried foods or large amounts of animals fats like what you find in steak. It was lean meats a few times a week, fresh veggies and fresh fruits.

1

rosesincedar t1_ivhedgp wrote

Maybe the older, not as good quality studies. Newer studies show saturated fat doesn't contribute to cardiovascular disease. Also if you compare the nutrient profile of supposed super foods like kale to a rib eye there is no comparison. Especially when you factor in that most plant nutrients need to be converted to be used and are done so poorly.

Humans have been eating fatty red meats for thousands of years at least so not sure why it would all of a sudden be seen as bad.

2

lookylookylulu t1_ivhf6nf wrote

It's not bad. I never ever said it was bad. You need protein as it is an essential part of the human diet and so is fat. But we don't need that much of it. Too much of the fats and red meat is proinflamatory. It's really about balance. A human cannot live in plants alone nor can they live on meat alone. The two work together. Plant sterols and phenols ant anti-inflammatory and they are also rich in stuff you can't get from meat. And you do need more of it.

1