Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j1c41gd wrote

[deleted]

−4

ScienceOverNonsense t1_j1c7ory wrote

If you read the article you would know that it was published in PLOS ONE, an open-access, peer reviewed journal. Norml merely reported a summary.

80

WilliamMinorsWords t1_j1c7s13 wrote

So post that. Primary sources are always more credible.

−90

95knolan t1_j1cep10 wrote

Or read the article before you review it ?

38

briancoat t1_j1c8456 wrote

PLOS ONE is

33

[deleted] t1_j1c89ic wrote

[deleted]

−73

Bequeath_Thine_Booty t1_j1c8xwb wrote

Google it yourself?

11

[deleted] t1_j1c953k wrote

[deleted]

−17

RTukka t1_j1cdavl wrote

The rules state that a media summary of a peer reviewed article is acceptable. If the submitted article doesn't link the peer-reviewed article directly (this article does) then you're supposed to leave a comment to the peer-reviewed source.

32

xBambiraptorx t1_j1ezk4h wrote

You think the guy who didn’t read the article read the rules?

5

thatguy11 t1_j1ccbsq wrote

The ole, 'I've got a chance to call someone out for a bad title but then it backfired!' routine.

27