Submitted by Dalembert t3_11idx6f in singularity
maskedpaki t1_jayr8cq wrote
Reply to comment by TinyBurbz in Security robots patrolling a parking lot at night in California by Dalembert
>Those cameras look incredibly low to the ground to be of a tactical advantage. I highly doubt you know what you are talking about at this point. Also not sure how 3D space is relevant at all here. Explain.
Cameras are hung on high ceilings. They are often hard to see from and have blindspots.
​
>I don't need to be to know this is a shit idea, which is why I doubt your credentials.
lol my credentials ? You mean the 1 week long training I did to be a security guard? You have some weird idealised version of what a security guard is.
​
>Those cameras look incredibly low to the ground to be of a tactical advantage
humans are mostly standing on the ground in most crime scenes. Low is not a tactical disadvantage. Not when it can move around.
​
>The jokes write themselves.
And yet you were made by your parents.
​
>Bro, you are really tying to convince me that a: slow moving, undefended, low to the ground, plastic, multi-thousand dollar attractive nuance is an advantage over security cameras... because... 3D Space?
Yup.
​
​
>How does 3D space offer an advantage over cameras and motion sensors that have a vantage point?
Explain that to be "expert."
Because moving on the ground is like .. exactly what the job of a security guard is. We like walk around and observe whats going on in exactly the same way this bot does.
​
>I left willingly because the hours never seem to match well to my graduate school program.
What are you doubting here ? the reason I left being a security guard ? What would one gain from lying about that. Its not like its some high tier profession that only the select few can do. I was making 13.50 an hour.
​
>Thank god.
For someone who knows literally 0 about what the job entails you sure like to pass judgement about what makes a good security officer.
[deleted] t1_jayzl8n wrote
I think you may be arguing with a child or a teenager. Either way, the maturity is clearly one-sided here.
[deleted] t1_jaz7c73 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaz7gun wrote
Yep, this is definitely not an adult. Don't waste your energy.
TinyBurbz t1_jazkhoi wrote
>Yep, this is definitely not an adult.
I'd go out on a limb and guess Im old enough to be your parent.
NefariousNaz t1_jaznx4h wrote
The fact that you're using video game memes make me doubt that.
TinyBurbz t1_jazqc2k wrote
You know whats crazy, you are arguing on behalf if this nerd and you missed the part where these bots basically stopped being used in 2018 because of how easy to vandalize they are.
Also... video game memes?
NefariousNaz t1_jb20umm wrote
No I realize that I already read the comment. It doesn't take away from the fact that your posts are immature and filled with meme that originated in video games.
It sounds like you have no real world experience.
TinyBurbz t1_jb26u8w wrote
>No I realize that I already read the comment. It doesn't take away from the fact that your posts are immature and filled with meme that originated in video games.
"Meme that originated in videogames" says the cryprobro.
How are those bags feeling these days?
​
>It sounds like you have no real world experience.
Neither do you.
NefariousNaz t1_jb2zcor wrote
I've made hundreds of thousands of dollars. My bags are feeling fine. If you'll look at the market if you invested before 2021 you're ahead. Of course you haven't done any sort of research so you don't know that.
I'm not the one making posts using video game memes. And your post really is "no, u"? Can't come up with anything better?
[deleted] t1_jb32cd3 wrote
[removed]
NefariousNaz t1_jb37l5z wrote
Who cares about Andrew Tate loser?
TinyBurbz t1_jb3k6v1 wrote
>I'm not the one making posts using video game memes
Same attitude.
TinyBurbz t1_jaz915m wrote
> Cameras are hung on high ceilings. They are often hard to see from and have blindspots.
We are talking about the robot.
>Vandalising something with cameras sensors that can send an immediate distress signal is a very bad idea.
This one, the one you said has cameras.
> lol my credentials ? You mean the 1 week long training I did to be a security guard? You have some weird idealised version of what a security guard is.
I rest my case.
> humans are mostly standing on the ground in most crime scenes.
So now you remember the cameras are on the robot, convenient.
>Low is not a tactical disadvantage. Not when it can move around.
Yeah, you learned a lot about observation in that whopping week of training didn't you.
> And yet you were made by your parents
Not sure that works as well as you think it does.
> "Bro, you are really tying to convince me that a: slow moving, undefended, low to the ground, plastic, multi-thousand dollar attractive nuance is an advantage over security cameras... because... 3D Space?"
> Yup.
Meanwhile, in reality these things get attacked with barbecue sauce and tarps before being deemed pointless and expensive. (Happened in 2017)
> Because moving on the ground is like .. exactly what the job of a security guard is.
It's more than walking beats. But you'd know that if you had more than a week.
>We like walk around and observe whats going on in exactly the same way this bot does.
Yeah, but you can defend yourself from a tarp. You dont become suddenly useless cause someone sprayed sauce on you.
> What are you doubting here ?
That you are in any kind of "graduate program"
>What would one gain from lying about that.
Trying to seem more well educated in order to win this argument that you have lost horribly.
>Its not like its some high tier profession that only the select few can do. I was making 13.50 an hour.
Wow, you worked as a minimum wage guard at some cushy office after a whopping week of training.
That qualifies you so much to speak on security systems, huh?
> For someone who knows literally 0 about what the job entails you sure like to pass judgement about what makes a good security officer.
You had ONE WEEK of training.
maskedpaki t1_jaz9xqo wrote
>We are talking about the robot
I was comparing the robot to static cameras. Read the conversation again you dipshit.
>It's more than walking beats. But you'd know that if you had more than a week.
I worked for several years. The week is for learning theory about the legal responsibilities. You can't even distinguish work from training you absolute moron.
>Wow, you worked as a minimum wage guard at some cushy office after a whopping week of training.
I've worked in several places spanning from retail to construction sites and yes cushy offices.
>You had ONE WEEK of training
Read the comment dipshit. I mention that you have 0 experience with what the JOB entails. I didn't work at the JOB for a week.
TinyBurbz t1_jazi044 wrote
>I was comparing the robot to static cameras. Read the conversation again you dipshit.
So you *intentionally* spoke about the wrong thing in context. Neat.
>I worked for several years. The week is for learning theory about the legal responsibilities.
For whatever chair surfing you did, sure.
What about guards who have to learn Defensive-Evassive driving and carry guns... not quite the same training is it?
You dont know shit compared to them.
Your experience as security doesn't qualify you to speak on these bots.
>You can't even distinguish work from training you absolute moron.
Man you just gotta win this huh.
>I've worked in several places spanning from retail to construction sites and yes cushy offices.
Wow.
>Read the comment dipshit. I mention that you have 0 experience with what the JOB entails. I didn't work at the JOB for a week.
Listen here Paul Blart, the purpose of this coversation was to discuss the viability of the K5 robot; that you are defending.
https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/18/us/security-robot-drown-trnd/index.html
Oh and when its actually needed to call security it tells you to fuck off and plays a song:
Edit:
crickets chirping
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments