Imagine thinking eliminating labor and thus the bargaining power of the lower classes would somehow HARM the status quo.

FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE

Boy I love being right.

>Also, if people would have invested in real skills instead of relying on existing in front of a camera for a few seconds this wouldn't be a problem to them.

Im convinced a fuck load of you are jobless and poor relishing it happening to the rest of us.

Almost all water you have drank has some water that has passed through your body previously.

Purpose built robots will always be better than a humanoid.

As reliant as we are on all of our digital technology, we don't need it in every day life. Yeah it would fucking suck to have to go to the library instead of googling, and you have to check the newspaper for stuff like showtimes... but it wouldnt cripple society. Electricity is definitely a need for various reasons, but likewise, most of our modern world could be analog and we wouldn't miss much but our memes.

GPT kind of falls into the same category as smartphones, imo.

Nice to have, but if they all broke tomorrow our lifestyle quality wouldn't change much.

Most likely never.

Future bots would most undoubtedly look more like Star Wars with an assortment of purpose built designs; with humanoid bots used only for social interaction.

>you missed the point

No I didn't your point is just wrong.
You are implying that schools only teach you to write essays.

>Knowing how to write an effective essay is going to be useless in 5 years.

You've missed the point of why we write them.

Yeah, but schools offer CNC machining and start you on the path with basic metal working. Likewise, you don't just write essays in school. In other classes, like history, you are assigned an essay to write to show you grasp at least one small portion of the topic. Essay writing demonstrates a grasp of knowledge on a topic, it is not the purpose of the topic.

Unlike a calculator, GPT isn't integral to high level completion of any task. Where as primitive math computers, like the abacus, have always been a need in mathematics.

Wanna try writing that one yourself, OP?

>Knowing how to write an effective essay is going to be useless in 5 years. Essays are inefficient ways to communicate information.

There is a reason essay writing is important, owing nothing to "efficiency"

​

>It would be like teaching high schools blacksmithing when we have cnc machining.

Funny you mention it, if you want to do machining you usually start with basic metalworking; so this comparison is weak as your remarks about efficiency.

>they're now widely accepted as a helpful tool for students.

Only after a certain level of math.

There is a reason we have had to rebrand arithmetic as "common core math" and it has to do with the years of memorization and calculator use over teaching children how to use numbers.

They were right.

They are 100% an attractive nuisance which is why they stopped marketing them for the most part, years ago.

>I'm not the one making posts using video game memes

Same attitude.

>No I realize that I already read the comment. It doesn't take away from the fact that your posts are immature and filled with meme that originated in video games.

"Meme that originated in videogames" says the cryprobro.

How are those bags feeling these days?

​

>It sounds like you have no real world experience.

Neither do you.

You know whats crazy, you are arguing on behalf if this nerd and you missed the part where these bots basically stopped being used in 2018 because of how easy to vandalize they are.

Also... video game memes?

>Yep, this is definitely not an adult.

I'd go out on a limb and guess Im old enough to be your parent.

>You say "you don't know what's its like to work in security" as if you were working for the NSA.

Watch out. In another thread maskedpaki told us ALL about his WEEK of training!

> It's a simple job and a machine like in the article could do 90% of what I spent my time doing.

Thats why these machines were mostly abandoned by adopters almost entirely in 2018 right?

> Yes and you who has never worked a security job knows way more about how the job works than someone who worked it in a variety of roles and companies over years.

You know "knowing how the job works" has 0 to do with "knowing an expensive robot is a target for vandals"

> a keyboard warrior who has never worked a day as a guard would know.

Yeah, you were working hard sitting on your ass.

>I was comparing the robot to static cameras. Read the conversation again you dipshit.

So you *intentionally* spoke about the wrong thing in context. Neat.

>I worked for several years. The week is for learning theory about the legal responsibilities.

For whatever chair surfing you did, sure.

What about guards who have to learn Defensive-Evassive driving and carry guns... not quite the same training is it?

You dont know shit compared to them.

Your experience as security doesn't qualify you to speak on these bots.

>You can't even distinguish work from training you absolute moron.

Man you just gotta win this huh.

>I've worked in several places spanning from retail to construction sites and yes cushy offices.

Wow.

>Read the comment dipshit. I mention that you have 0 experience with what the JOB entails. I didn't work at the JOB for a week.

Listen here Paul Blart, the purpose of this coversation was to discuss the viability of the K5 robot; that you are defending.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/18/us/security-robot-drown-trnd/index.html

https://abc7news.com/police-say-drunk-man-knocked-down-security-robot-in-mountain-view-k-5-knightscope-robots-named-k5/1915713/

Oh and when its actually needed to call security it tells you to fuck off and plays a song:

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/robocop-park-fight-how-expectations-about-robots-are-clashing-reality-n1059671

Edit:

crickets chirping

> In my own experience

The week of it?