Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TinyBurbz t1_iqki44u wrote

I dont think a lot of this tech is going anywhere.

​

Step outside the tech-woo bubble and people hate AI generated content with a passion.

Here come the grifters lmao.

−14

Evideyear t1_iqkijf8 wrote

In fairness though the public rarely likes a new technology. In time though it becomes accepted. The internet is a prime example of that.

23

TinyBurbz t1_iqkip70 wrote

>The internet is a prime example of that.

Somethings are just never fully accepted, and I really don't see AI generated content being one of those things. I really only see all of this tech being used for scams and ads. That's where it already is.

−15

Akushin t1_iqkyzv9 wrote

Exact same thing was said about the car

7

TinyBurbz t1_iqkzych wrote

>Exact same thing was said about the car

Lmao what

−5

Akushin t1_iqlj6o7 wrote

“The car will never be accepted as standard transportation “ “Oh, the tv is just a fad!” Seriously, it’s the mating call of the dunce.

8

TinyBurbz t1_iqobc5t wrote

Lmao, cars actually provide something useful.

Art is not useful.

−2

Akushin t1_iqog455 wrote

What a dumb thing to say. So you are positing that the entertainment industry serves absolutely no purpose?

5

TinyBurbz t1_iqogsvz wrote

Yeah, I can really carry home the groceries and the kids with AI Art. Ha ha

Dumbass.

−3

Akushin t1_iqomjr0 wrote

Yeah, it’s not useful for TRANSPORTATION, you dingus. But awesome straw man. Maybe you want to try some intelligent discourse next or do you stop at fallacious arguments?

5

TinyBurbz t1_iqov0hu wrote

>Maybe you want to try some intelligent discourse next or do you stop at fallacious arguments?

I stop at comparing something that is subject to universal scorn outside the /r/singularity / techbro bubble to the fucking automobile.

−1

Akushin t1_iqrlnr5 wrote

Are you really this dense? I’m not comparing AI art with automobiles as a technology , I’m pointing out that the acceptance of new technologies is almost universally resisted. Automobiles only came up because they were roundly bashed in the beginning. I also used the example of the tv. I could have easily used airplanes, cell phones , the printing press, or a slew of other technologies.

1

TinyBurbz t1_iqrlt4m wrote

>Are you really this dense? I’m not comparing AI art with automobiles as a technology ,

You literally just did.

1

Akushin t1_iqtve7w wrote

Again, I hope you are doing this deliberately because otherwise you are borderline mentally handicapped. I didn’t compare the two technologies. I referenced two historical instances where people said a technology would never be mainstream and how wrong they were. Try to keep up, chucky

0

TinyBurbz t1_iquj87s wrote

> I referenced two historical instances where people said a technology would never be mainstream and how wrong they were.

Like the Segway?

0

Akushin t1_iqybaew wrote

Lmao, damn you reaching. You realize the Segway is used extensively in tourism and law enforcement? Better choice would have maybe been the HDDVD or Betamax formats. But again those weren’t really cutting edge even by the standards of the time. AI is a world changing technology on the same level as automobiles, mechanized factories, the tv, and electricity. Segway didn’t have near the same potential.

0

TinyBurbz t1_iqzp68f wrote

Also used extensively in killing yourself after getting caught wanking a dog:
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna39377851

0

Akushin t1_ir0midb wrote

Yup, extensively == 1. Yup.

0

TinyBurbz t1_ir11d6x wrote

>Yup, extensively

Your words.

0

Akushin t1_ir11uoy wrote

Yeah, my word… that I used correctly. 😂

1

TinyBurbz t1_ir137dk wrote

>Yeah, my word… that I used correctly

So you admit your example of "extensive" wasn't very extensive?

0

Akushin t1_ir17jvt wrote

Damn you dumb. Done wasting my time on a waste of space. Peace ✌🏻

0

TinyBurbz t1_ir1bwwr wrote

>Damn you dumb. Done wasting my time on a waste of space

Come back when you aren't comparing AI art to the automobile.

0

3Quondam6extanT9 t1_iqkmtvm wrote

The only reason the public generally doesn't integrate with tech is the accessibility and cost of said technology. The more AI is developed in different areas under different circumstances, the more it becomes normalized, and even now AI in general is used on a daily basis with the population barely recognizing they use it.

As long as the populace isn't forced to pay a lot and as long as the tech sector is capable of broader case use/ open source systems, it will continue to happen and integrate into normal life.

7

SWATSgradyBABY t1_iqkuc5o wrote

This isn't true. People often don't know AI generated content when they see/hear it

6

r0cket-b0i t1_iqksau1 wrote

People in general can't tell the difference at all... unless it's a robo-customer support when they call their bank or doctor etc. This "hate" part is actually very much a tech-woo perception, "gamers hate nfts" "people hate ai art", not even close, this is an internalized view. People care about what matters to them, the value and benefits.

3