Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ipatimo t1_j64218q wrote

Reply to comment by No_Ninja3309_NoNoYes in Asking here and not on an artist subreddit because you guys are non-artists who love AI and I don't want to get coddled. Genuinely, is there any point in continuing to make art when everything artists could ever do will be fundamentally replaceable in a few years? by [deleted]

Training your wet neural network on existing masterpieces, you mean?

3

[deleted] OP t1_j646klp wrote

Brains and computers are not nearly as comparable as tech people act like they are, unfortunately

0

ipatimo t1_j646v5a wrote

Are you sure? More I understand how Neural Networks work, more similarities I see.

1

[deleted] OP t1_j6474im wrote

Googling “brains are not computers article” will give a few well articulated opposing perspectives, also the brain can’t really be taken as a separate entity from the body, unlike software which can be completely disembodied

2

ipatimo t1_j64a76y wrote

Found only antiscientific nonsenses.

0

[deleted] OP t1_j64aq6e wrote

Scientific American and articles by PhD neuroscientists are anti scientific nonsense? Okay, reflexively close your mind to anything you don’t want to believe

3

TinyBurbz t1_j64k77k wrote

> More I understand how Neural Networks work, more similarities I see.

Dunning Kruger effect.

2