Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

blue4204 t1_je22hva wrote

Because on Earth the light from the stars illuminates the air in front of us. While in space there's nothing for the light to illuminate.

−9

CremePuffBandit t1_je22mn6 wrote

Because most space pictures are taken during the day on their respective planet/moon. The sun washes everything else out, just like what happens during the day on Earth.

7

svarogteuse t1_je22qxr wrote

Pictures of other objects in space, say astronauts, are taken in the daylight so said foreground objects are lit. You don't see stars in the daylight on Earth (or large cities with lots of light pollution) either because they are to faint. Same thing applies to space.

The sky is black because the bright sun light is not scattered producing blue not because its dark.

9

MovingFjordward t1_je23hpm wrote

Light exposure. Big bright sun is much brighter so the dim stars disappear. Same reason you don't see stars during the day on Earth. Turn your phone brightness all the way down during the day putside and you will barely be able to see the screen if at all. Do it again at night in a dark room and that same setting is completely visible.

33

Klondike2022 t1_je23mt3 wrote

I mean, James Webb and Hubble see a lot of stars from space

8

mmixLinus t1_je282wq wrote

Take a shoe outside during a sunny day and take a picture of it.

At night, take a picture of the Moon.

What do these images have in common? They are both of sunlight reflected once, which means they were taken using the same settings!

So anything sunlit in space is going to be so bright you will have to lower the exposure settings to not get an over-exposed image, which will also result in no stars, as they are so much weaker.

2

Ritari_Assa-arpa t1_je28wr9 wrote

When looking sky during daytime our atmosfare makes sky blue, which means there is some matter what effects way we see sky and space. When taking pics shooting parameters are adjusted to get best possible, or wanted, outcome to taken pic; ISO, shutter speed, aperture. If you take on the moon sky will appear black.

However, if you take pic about sky from moon it shouldnt matter if its moons day or night. Sun might lit whole moon, but without atmosfare there cant be same light pollution we have on earth. Same goes if you are on space walk, facing away from earth, moon and sun, there is nothing to reflect sun light since its empty vacuum. There cant be light pollution which will effect taken pic. Then it should be possible to take picture of all stars when you adjust settings right for stars and you are back against sun, earth and moon.

There is another way to think this over; when we are on earth during night we see sky as black, full of stars (depending on light pollution here on earth), but night for us, on dark side of earth, is illusion created by body of earth. Night sky we see is only partially shadowed by earth body, and space around that shadow is full of sun light, we just dont see it because there is nothing to reflect it to us.

Since earth is "round" we can play with idea we are precisely middle of the night on middle of calm pacific ocean. This means you are looking sky from surface of ball limited only horizon and you are from your point of view, middle of the night, at the "highest point' of that ball, earth precisely between you and sun. We all know how light goes straight line from sun, and night is just shadow created by body of earth, and this means sky around horizon cant be in earths shadow. Still we can see those stars. Sun doesnt wash away stars, but during night time without lit atmosfare we see clearly what space looks like.

3

Nerull t1_je2gtig wrote

If you have access to a camera with manual exposure settings, here's an experiment: Setup the exposure for a properly exposed, sun lit daytime photo.

Without touching the settings, take the camera outside at night, point it at the sky, and snap a photo. What do you think you'll capture?

The answer is: nothing. The stars are far too dim, compared to sunlight, to show up in the exposure at all. Most space photography is done in sunlight, of things that are sun lit. The cameras are set to properly exposed these sun lit things, and the lack of an atmosphere doesn't change the fact that the stars are just too dim to show up in the same exposure.

2

Micke_xyz t1_je2hg82 wrote

Now, let's take a moment to appreciate the wide dynamic range of the humen eye. Sure, if you look at the sun you will damage your eyes but it's still possible to see the contours of the sun, it's not a big white blur in that part of the sky.

And with that same "tool", we are able to clearly detect stars at night.

7

LaunchTransient t1_je2jqny wrote

Yes, human eyes are amazing - but note that they cannot observe both phenomena at the same time. In sunlight, your irises constrict a lot and it's still dazzling - under a night sky they quadruple in diameter, so that's an 16:1 ratio when they fully dilate to when they fully constrict.

I doubt you could be able to gather enough light to see stars at full constriction, and your retina would be utterly overwhelmed if you tried viewing the sun with a fully dilated iris.

3

PistolNinja t1_je2neiz wrote

You can mimic the same effect with a DSLR camera. Take a shot of anything with the aperture wide open, let's say say f1.2. Then without changing anything else, tighten the aperture to f5.6 or higher and the image will be WAY darker.

2

montagdude87 t1_je2y8xq wrote

I see stars in lots of images taken from space. See: Hubble, JWST.

1

Deyln t1_je411k9 wrote

The space satellites aren't really dslesigned to take pictures in the range that humans see either.

1

TreeHawkFeather t1_je6miap wrote

So much light pollution on the moon. We really need to scale back development 😆😜

1