Submitted by Creepy_Toe2680 t3_10ozjk9 in space
curiousauruses t1_j6isdwg wrote
Reply to comment by Creepy_Toe2680 in NASA tested new propulsion tech that could unlock new deep space travel possibilities by Creepy_Toe2680
Does this mean the scify art where spaceships emit little rings from their exhaust isn't that far off?
a10t2 t1_j6jvqt1 wrote
The "blue glow" type of propulsion is probably an ion engine, which is essentially just propellant + electricity. From a sci-fi perspective you'd want to generate that electricity with a fusion reactor.
Hampamatta t1_j6lthgq wrote
Theoretically ion engines are the pinnacle of propulsion. Far more efficient than normal combustion engines. And doesn't satellites already use small ion engines for realignment?
Earthfall10 t1_j6lv6wv wrote
Eh, there are other electric engine options that are better than ion engines, such as plasma engines or mass drivers. And if power isn't a limiting factor the ultimate in propellent efficiency is a photon rocket, aka a light bulb. No need to carry propellent, though you need 300 megawatts of photons to get a pathetic newton of thrust, so whatever reactor is powering it will need a shit ton of fuel. Though if you're using a laser array to push a mirrored sail that power plant can remain on the ground.
FrozenChocoProduce t1_j6mb7oo wrote
I remember reading about a fusion reactor variant, that, while not ouputting a net gain, might be used (while using up porpellant) to accelerate particles in a rocket engine (usable only in the vacuum of space)...and some well-funded startup already developing this?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments