Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Rawesome16 t1_j3tk3tw wrote

Reply to comment by yellowbellee in California Legislative Women's Caucus calls for removal of Dana White as UFC president by Responsible-Lunch815

Yes. Don't hit unless you are ready to be hit back.

If a small man hit a large man, and the large man hit back, that's equal. It's not the fault of the large man he is bigger and stronger.

I fully admit to reading this article and nothing more, so this is the first in hearing of him hitting her twice. I read he slapped her back and they were quickly separated so you have info I don't on this.

But yes, hit for hit that's equal. Try not hitting those you can't take a hit from

13

yellowbellee t1_j3tlkcr wrote

Can’t wait til you explain that to a judge after you strike a kid that hit you. “But your honor, that’s equality” man on man is more equal but still never truly equal. You need to know EXACTLY what equality even means. And that you don’t child.

−13

Rawesome16 t1_j3tlsur wrote

Oh so a kid is a man? That's interesting. Didn't know that. How dumb are you exactly?

Ok that's rude, first I should establish if English is your primary language. If it isn't I will happily take my rude words back. If it is, my question stands

9

[deleted] t1_j3tm4zw wrote

[removed]

−2

Rawesome16 t1_j3tmw1u wrote

I mis-read your comment, this is why punctuation helps. Like periods, commas, or things like that. But I happily admit I mis-read that.

That being said, why am I hiring a child when I was talking about man v man.

And equality means if a woman hits a man she better be ready to be hit back. Equal rights equal lefts and all.

The fact you can't understand to just not hit people unless ready to be hit back proves your dumbasshood.

Buh-by little troll. I've no more time to waste on one such as you

4

[deleted] t1_j3tnbnh wrote

[removed]

−2

Rawesome16 t1_j3tnpiz wrote

Ah my assuming little simpleton. If she hits him she should expect to be hit back.

Your day "conservative sounding" like it's an insult. Shows how sheepish your truly are. If your own to far in any directing you are a dumbass. I see I've found a dumbass who lands far too much one way.

Little simpleton got his undies in a bunch. How sad

3

yellowbellee t1_j3tojng wrote

Oh wow look who’s back so soon. Why is your dumbass still talking about expectations? When did I ever bring any of that up? The topic is equality. God your stupid. Can’t even write one paragraph correctly without fucking it up ya conservative dummy. Let me teach you again with another example and try to stay on topic. I bet you think this conversation is equal because you get to comment and I get to comment. Now 1 comment against another comment on that basis alone is equal. But one comment from you against one comment from me is not. Because you’re dumb as a fuckin stump and I’m far more intelligent. Go rest on that sweetheart.

−1

Rawesome16 t1_j3toyra wrote

Why still a wall of text?

Have you not learned how to use punctuation yet? They help get your point across. Since you are not worth the time of reading that wall of text.

But considering how much name calling you line to use I see your youth or stupidity. Your choice which it is. Stay mad little human. It's a good look for you

3

[deleted] t1_j3tp5qn wrote

[removed]

0

Rawesome16 t1_j3tpohs wrote

Now that's better. You used periods. Your leaning! I'm proud of you.

2

yellowbellee t1_j3tpw1u wrote

Hahahaha “leaning” fuck you just keep doubling down. Try again sweetie

0

Rawesome16 t1_j3trql6 wrote

No more walks of text, use of punctuation, I would say that means you are learning. Still an ass, but as my mom says : "we all have an asshole, some just like to show it off more."

Feel free to stop showing yours off so much. Nobody likes to see it

3

[deleted] t1_j3tsolg wrote

[removed]

0

Rawesome16 t1_j3tusfc wrote

Yup, at work and don't care about proof reading while swype typing.

I like your use of punctuation though. You can claim you don't care, but you are using the punctuation I suggested wonderfully, so good job.

Don't act like you could handle my mom. She is far too much woman for you random redditor.

3

jrhooo t1_j4br99e wrote

> man on man is more equal

that statement tells though doesn't it?

HOW is it more equal? This statement doesn't address size in any way. You statement suggests that gender/age is the defining guideline in what's "equal".

1