Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] OP t1_janfz8e wrote

Reply to comment by blu3dice in Man used drone to fly cell phones into Springfield's Fed Med, prosecutors say by [deleted]

Yes. But at this time he is facing no charges for what he did with a drone.

−8

blu3dice t1_jani99c wrote

Because it's Federal land! Missouri can't charge him for crimes that occur on Federal property. Do you want the Federal government to prematurely charge him before a complete investigation? Was Springfield Fed Med the only prison he visited? Is he part of a bigger criminal organization?

11

[deleted] OP t1_janjpes wrote

I never said anything about Missouri charging him. What I did say was he's not being charged for the drone crime. I never said he couldn't be charged in the future. I made a comment based on what is said in the article I posted.

−10

Why_T t1_janycvn wrote

Your comment is very accusatory in that you feel slighted by no charges being filed. That's why people are having issues. Instead of "And yet he's not being charged" you should have something more like "And no charges have yet been filed" Do you see the difference?

8