Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Seankps t1_jcyibvr wrote

Important to remember, like Google and Meta, they were over hiring. As a software engineer, I was getting a couple of calls a week from Amazon recruiters. Even though I had recently interviewed and wasn’t allowed to interview again for six months. They didn’t care, they didn’t check, they were hiring for whatever.

156

Fenix42 t1_jcyswhs wrote

I am in a lower population area of California that has an Amazon office. It's small. Less than 100 people. I know a big chunk of the people there. I was getting pinged on Linkedin to interview every few weeks for a while. It stopped about 6 months ago.

56

enjoytheshow t1_jcz44ni wrote

Hiring freeze started in October IIRC

30

Fenix42 t1_jd0kxmd wrote

Souunds about right. I was laid off in June of 2021. Started the current job that Sept. I did the initial screening stuff with them when I got the offer for my current job. I was getting pinged by them like 1x a month until about October.

2

Dredly t1_jd126yy wrote

Bingo - Hiring through the pandemic was seen as a sign of brand health and confidence by investors, as soon as it "ended" they immediately went "wait, our earnings per share went down, What!?!?!?" and thus mass layoffs

8

kariam_24 t1_jd26qx6 wrote

Right, people are fearmongering, ingoring numbers, for example Microsoft which laid off 10k people while recruiting 40k positions during pandemic.

1

hoodyninja t1_jd14hwy wrote

Exactly. Always more to the story than the headline. A couple of years ago they were around 900k employees and are now around 1.6MILLION employees. Yes with this additional 9,000 they are around 35,000 layoffs…. That’s not a lot.

If any other company was like, “hey everyone over the past 2-3 years we doubled our staff and over-hired a bit… and are correcting this year. Unfortunately we are going to lay off 2% of the staff (again we doubled our staff and have to reduce by 2% now).” it likely wouldn’t make headlines.

8

TomPrince t1_jd18v2c wrote

This is a great point. Amazon should quantify their layoffs as a percentage.

4

hoodyninja t1_jd197i0 wrote

Hahaha right?

I don’t know for sure but I imagine they do to their shareholders but a headline of “Amazon doubles workforce in 2 years and then corrects by 2%” doesn’t sound like it’s gonna get clicks

4

DevAway22314 t1_jd4bzcl wrote

The vast majority of those employees are warehouse and delivery roles

It's useless to lump them in with the corporate and tech roles, which is where all the layoffs are

3

HarleyNBarley t1_jd19c6b wrote

Can you tel me a little more around how not being allowed to interview for 6 months works? Like they flag you if the interview doesn’t go very well? Unfit for one doesn’t mean the same for a different role and team so curious how that would work?

2

Seankps t1_jd2oa7u wrote

If you don’t do very well in the coding test, they don’t let you just try again tomorrow, or next week. You have to wait six months.

1

clev1 t1_jd373hm wrote

I experienced the same exact thing with them. It was absolutely crazy. We had a few people leave our company for Amazon. Looking back at it, I bombed the first interview and I’m kind of glad I did because it would have landed me on their Luna team which I’m almost certain is on the chopping block.

1

Justifyz t1_jczgg0j wrote

Over hiring will do that

30

novacolumbia t1_jd0jnqn wrote

Jassy sounds like an asshole. This makes sense, the RTO policy is likely an attempt to get people to resign in order to save on lay off costs.

The tech industry lately has been so frustrating.

24

sirpiplup t1_jd233di wrote

The tech industry late has been so frustrating because they’re finally coming back down to earth and business reality now that company valuations have dropped. When valuations are sky high then employees can be richly compensated.

5

xnfd t1_jczpeop wrote

Please lay me off anytime for that 3+ month severance. You're supposed to jump around every 2 years for the best salary anyway

12

signed7 t1_jczrpr4 wrote

Doesn't work when every other big tech is on hiring freeze though

93

brogrammer9k t1_jd3vogp wrote

Freezes but also fiercely competitive with all the layoffs. A friend of mine works in infosec and ive been trying to help him with finding remote work. These positions are so competitve, most openings at respectable places have thousands of applicants. We've had some friends with FAANG experience review his resume and make a few tweaks, which IMO is solid. I think at this point he's applied to over 40 positions and hasn't been able to get a single interview. Shits rough.

4

DevAway22314 t1_jd4d0bd wrote

Infosec is still pretty hot in terms of hiring. Companies only spend the money they have to on security, so they haven't really been able to cut it at all unless they're accepting higher risk (which some are, but the skill gap is still huge)

What role is he going for the he can't get interviews? My LinkedIn inbox is still consistently full, and I have had no problem getting interviews when I poke around to test the waters

For anyone with experience, most technical security roles are plentiful

1

Waaypoint t1_jd7qlth wrote

I hate to say it runs like this but it sort of does.

They need to be in the same groups and clubs as the people working or hiring at the companies they want to work for.

While they may eventually get something with just a resume, referrals from local infosec groups, meetups, and clubs is extremely helpful.

Also, at least in infosec, I haven't seen FAANG companies all that interested in hiring remote work at the moment. In fact, those remote seem to be disproportionately targeted in these rounds of layoffs. I've had more remote or hybrid job offers from smaller infosec companies. Just take care if they are looking at a private company without a predetermined exit strategy.

In my experience these smaller companies expect you to know their specific product and services prior to interview; particularity in cloud (e.g. containers, docker, apps, etc).

TLDR: There are a solid number of small public (and private) security focused companies with remote work. Getting referred in from people you know is important. Knowing the specific product/tech wins the interview.

1

Playertee t1_jd0pwxs wrote

They’ll unfreeze eventually

1

NewPresWhoDis t1_jd0y6z0 wrote

No. Replaced with companies that actually innovate. Two of the FAANGs exist solely to push ads.

17

IrvineCrips t1_jd11qh3 wrote

Jump around all you want, but new devs are the first to get cut when layoffs happen

13

QuantumMirage t1_jd0qusu wrote

True! But for about 50% of the people at Amazon, their tenure is less than one year - that is not an exaggeration. Their recent hiring spree was profound.

2

theJamesKPolk t1_jcyi3ya wrote

They probably added like 80 in new corporate workers over the past few years…not surprised

9

bastardoperator t1_jczmlka wrote

I've been hit up by both an Amazon and Google recruiter with the last 10 days on LinkedIn. I wouldn't consider either based on their failed business plans and sticking it to the workers.

7

bloatedkat t1_jd00rrm wrote

And they still have too many employees

3

Boring_Train_273 t1_jd1p2d8 wrote

I mean, they over-hired. What do people expect? It’s a business and it needs to make money to survive. Blatantly hating Amazon for no reason.

1

redbo t1_jd1pvsk wrote

I was hoping the tech giants had planned and did all their layoffs at once. It really kills productivity being at a company that’s shedding jobs every quarter, not knowing when it’ll be your turn.

1

Responsible_Manner t1_jd1uen7 wrote

Does anyone think this is actually related to emerging AI that can make work more "efficient", requiring fewer humans? It seems likely with all the tech layoffs...but this is never a talking point in media.

1

gibberingfool t1_jd2twpa wrote

Way too early for that. It hasn't been operationalized yet. Give it a few more years.

4

Responsible_Manner t1_jd4k3g6 wrote

What happens then? Really massive layoffs?

1

gibberingfool t1_jd4ppn9 wrote

We don't really know. Less people will be needed to do the same or more amount of work, but I don't think it will outright eliminate large swaths of jobs. I think it will be a mixture of:

  • Some jobs will completely reduce in number or disappear completely (think travel agents after the Internet)
  • Many jobs will be able to use workers who have learned how to use AI to do their jobs more effectively, thereby squeezing more productivity out of the same amount of workers (which would result potentially in reduced hiring)
  • New categories of jobs we can't even think of will be created

I think in the long term, we will adapt. There is no shortage of work to be done. In the short term, there will be a lot of pain and insecurity, especially for the poorest and most vulnerable.

2

galacticwonderer t1_jd1uv55 wrote

Why was everyone in tech over hiring? Why did this get so crazy?

1

kariam_24 t1_jd273vb wrote

Because there was sudden demand during pandemic? Why are you asking about obvious reason?

1

harrymfa t1_jd01hf0 wrote

They bought a lot of business and let them rot, from Comixology to Twitch. I heard months ago that even Alexa is on the chopping block.

−1

nubsauce87 t1_jd294ih wrote

Bezos could cut his pay by the amount it would take to keep those people on and he wouldn't even notice...

Hell, he could cover 10x that and probably wouldn't notice...

edit: in fact, according to some back-of-the-envelope math and quick googling, I'm fairly certain that Jeff Bezos makes more money in a year than all of his employees combined... And if he doesn't, it's damned close.

−2

DevAway22314 t1_jd4dbmq wrote

Bezos isn't the CEO anymore. Hasn't been for a while now. He does not get paid, he just owns stock

2

phdoofus t1_jcztygg wrote

Everyone just stop buying Amazon. If you can't make good business decisions that don't include 'significant overhiring', why exactly do you need to be rewarded in the marketplace?

−15

downonthesecond t1_jcyuv2n wrote

I would have thought this is good news.

Feels like months ago many on Reddit were still talking about all horror stories of working at Amazon, from spying on drivers to peeing in bottles to crunch time on projects to highly competitive workplace leading to burnout.

−26

[deleted] t1_jcyzrvd wrote

those aren't the people getting laid off, lol

32

downonthesecond t1_jcz0a3m wrote

>The latest round is expected to impact Amazon’s cloud computing, advertising, human resources and Twitch units.

They would fit in the latter two descriptions.

−21

chadshit t1_jcz05dk wrote

It’s all luck of the draw. Some teams are chill, but the company culture as a whole is pretty cutthroat. But I don’t think from an individual perspective getting laid off (especially in this job environment) is ever really an ideal situation

7

FarrisAT t1_jcynmie wrote

Damn I cannot twiddle my thumbs for $250k + RSUs (although they've lost value) anymore

−62

[deleted] t1_jcyxnqf wrote

[deleted]

−49

atx705 t1_jcztakp wrote

Do you actually think no one did any work when the pandemic hit and all offices were closed for months? Like no work was done at all?

8