Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

sysadminbj t1_iwisuxs wrote

There was a second where I thought that Apple was using a literal plant to make chips. Sometimes I am not smart.

40

surfingNerd t1_iwix3j7 wrote

How close are they to reducing the need for human assembly line workers and automation taking over a substantial part of assembly line?

3

Vaeon t1_iwixxn1 wrote

iPhones will soon cost $16,000

−5

EITBRU t1_iwiy0s6 wrote

I believe, because of COVID policies in China, the supply chains are disrupted there So Apple is trying to find alternatives suppliers. Their needs are huge!!! The rest of the article is politics !!

−1

geedavey t1_iwiyrdp wrote

Do you remember a few years ago when Apple CEO told President Obama that "those jobs are gone?" Turns out they weren't.

45

geedavey t1_iwiyxzo wrote

So, Elon Musk tried to create a robotic factory, spent a few billion figuring out what everyone else has figured out, that it doesn't work. There's even a video floating around of him saying that he underestimated the value of the human touch.

16

MossytheMagnificent t1_iwiz3mw wrote

This makes me a little uneasy. It's almost as if they are expecting trouble.

−6

Gulf_Sailor t1_iwj06zo wrote

We have too little water to be building chip plants out here

3

jphamlore t1_iwj5ykt wrote

How does sourcing chips that were never made in China move the supply chain away from China?

−3

TheJadedSF t1_iwj9bnj wrote

Not really. Why make something overseas when you can do it in your own backyard for the same or less, while improving availability for your products? China's lockdowns are hampering Apple right now big time. And not having a communist government impede your business is always preferable.

4

Just_Discussion6287 t1_iwjjfga wrote

Most jobs in the industry are going away. The factory that builds the PS5 has 5 floor workers.

When the factories are super autonomous it doesn't matter where they are built.

More jobs in shipping these products to the rest of the world than building them these days.

20

hammeredtrout1 t1_iwjjqaq wrote

I feel like this is to avoid tariffs, right? Maybe an unforeseen benefit of the CHIPS Act?

3

mipacu427 t1_iwk0r3u wrote

I disagree that "it doesn't matter where they are built". Even at heavily autonomous factories, skilled workers will be needed to maintain the machines, program the computers, maintain the facility, etc. Not to mention the logistics of shipping in materials, warehousing, and shipping out finished products.

21

IamChuckleseu t1_iwko2m0 wrote

Way more important than that is general safety of business. You can buy skilled workers if you have none (and China does not even have that many people on the top, they have more of a high skilled low and medium jobs workforce rather than high skilled job one). Either way you can not buy safe environment for your business where ruling dictator just does not wake up one day and steal all your stuff.

11

drawkbox t1_iwkp9fv wrote

Most chip plants recycle/reuse/reclaim almost all their water. Intel has always had that in the US, been doing that since the 90s in Arizona, and around 97% of water is fully reused.

Another aspect is it industry is built in the US and Arizona makes sense from environmental impacts (no earthquakes, hurricanes, winter etc) then the industry will make sure more water makes it to Arizona.

In a way having production in the desert there will lead to water innovation, like pipelines/geoengineering/solar stills/desalination/innovations on recycling more water and many other things.

Necessity drives innovation.

3

IamChuckleseu t1_iwkpfqf wrote

This is absolute nonsense. The only thing He admitted is that it was rushed. Not that it was wrong. Also it is outdated already. Tesla's factories are way more productive than other car maker companies. And it is not even close. Every company strives to remove low skilled workers. It is just about calculations on return of interest. Not some absurd "human touch". Everyone on engineering position in the industry will tell you that.

1

Just_Discussion6287 t1_iwku3ru wrote

Same reason the sony factories used to employ more people.

The automation doesn't destroy 200,000 jobs overnight. The factories you are referencing look a lot different post covid versus iphone 7. There are some design failures that are specific to apple products limiting automation for a couple of more years.

The technology for AI/ML digital twinning(nvidia omniverse isaac) and fine robot control is only months old not years.

2

Just_Discussion6287 t1_iwkugcm wrote

"More jobs in shipping these products to the rest of the world than building them these days."

Maintaining a series of machines is a lot less laborious. My example in the sony factory, there are only 4 employees that handle those roles. Compared to the 1,000s that you would expect. There's just not a lot of roles to carry on.

Think about the PS2, that required chip designers(Which is now AMD outsourced), more marketers, every part of the supply chain was larger included used games sales. Sony had 2x the employees in 2009 than it did in 2022. And half the revenue.

https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Companies/PlayStation-s-secret-weapon-a-nearly-all-automated-factory

5

ITlocknkey t1_iwlj4bn wrote

Only took them a few decades

1

skunksmasher t1_iwn7o7p wrote

I am lost? Is child slavery allowed in Arizona?

0