efs120 t1_jae7u8j wrote
Reply to comment by DUNG_INSPECTOR in Kat Coiro To Direct & Exec Produce CBS’ ‘Matlock’ Reboot Pilot, A Gender-Swap Reboot Of The Classic Legal Drama Starring Kathy Bates by Neo2199
The Simpsons used to have a running gag where all the old people in the retirement home want to do is watch Matlock and they react violently if they don’t get their way.
They dropped it because even in the late 90s, Matlock had zero cultural relevance with anyone under 70.
DUNG_INSPECTOR t1_jae82mi wrote
Cool. That doesn't change the fact that Matlock was on the air less than 30 years ago and to suggest that it's an impossibility for anyone alive to have seen the show is simply foolish.
efs120 t1_jae8fo6 wrote
Well good thing the poster never said there's no one left alive that has seen Matlock. He said the bulk of Matlock's demographic is probably dead by now, which given the numbers involved, is likely true.
I've seen people pick fights over stupid shit on reddit, but picking a fight over whether Matlock had old fans or not takes the cake.
DUNG_INSPECTOR t1_jae9c7y wrote
> picking a fight over whether Matlock had old fans or not takes the cake.
That's an odd take on this thread. I do not doubt that Matlock had an older audience, the only thing I did was point out that the show was on not that long ago.
I also have to point out the fact that you are here, picking a fight over the age of the Matlock audience. A little self-awareness can go a long way.
efs120 t1_jaea89o wrote
It's final episode was in the last century, and we are almost a quarter of the way through our current century. That's a long time.
DUNG_INSPECTOR t1_jaec9w0 wrote
It wasn't that long ago.
Are you done picking a fight over the age of Matlock's audience yet?
efs120 t1_jaed387 wrote
No one’s picking a fight over the age of Matlock’s audience. It’s a fact that they were very old in 1995 and between now and then, the majority of people watching the show have passed on to the next life.
What we have is someone who didn’t know the age of Matlock’s audience (you) who decided to jump in and try to “well actually” another person, then moved the goalposts when they were shown to be talking out of their ass.
DUNG_INSPECTOR t1_jaeduiq wrote
> What we have is someone who didn’t know the age of Matlock’s audience
I do know the age of Matlock's audience as I am 45 years old and remember it being on air.
> > who decided to jump in and try to “well actually” another person
Literally the only thing my original comment said was that the show was on the air until 1995. > > then moved the goalposts
I have not moved any goalposts. I do not think a large number of original Matlock fans are alive, but I do believe that it is a larger number than the person I originally replied to was suggesting. That's it.
> No one’s picking a fight over the age of Matlock’s audience
> ...
> talking out of their ass.
It's amusing that you claim to not be picking a fight and then go on that little rant afterwards. You seem to be very worked up over this and I have no interest in arguing with you. I will not be replying to anymore combative comments on your part.
efs120 t1_jaeesoa wrote
Ok, Dung Inspector.
DUNG_INSPECTOR t1_jaempe1 wrote
Still trying to pick a fight, huh?
efs120 t1_jaemv6b wrote
I thought you were done replying, Dung Inspector. All I said was okay.
DUNG_INSPECTOR t1_jaenbg8 wrote
> picking a fight over whether Matlock had old fans or not takes the cake.
efs120 t1_jaenep1 wrote
You’re still on that? Move on, man.
DUNG_INSPECTOR t1_jaenrqz wrote
> picking a fight over whether Matlock had old fans or not takes the cake.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments