Submitted by DancesWithTreetops t3_126qiqi in washingtondc
About three years ago I reported the priest who abused me when I was in elementary school. I reported to the Archdiocese of Washingtons Office of child protection. I reported knowing that I am well outside of the statute of limitations for any type of civil remedy, and the person who abused me is dead so there won't be any criminal charges. My reasons for reporting were a symbolic transferring of the shame and guilt to the proper place and it has brought me a ton of relief. My only goal in reporting is to obtain an apology from the Pope. It may sound like a lofty goal, but after a conversation with a former Vatican ambassador, I was assured that my goal is within the realm of possibility.
When I reported, I was surprised to find out that the person at the office of child protection was someone I went to elementary school with, and knew the priest. I was actually relieved to talk to a familiar face, and she has been nothing but appropriately helpful and concerned. My rant has nothing to do with her. She referred me to an investigator at Davis Polk in DC. They were retained to conduct an investigation into the behavior of the priest who abused me. It turns out, he was already being investigated when I reported, and there are others.
Monsignor James F Montgomery is the name of the priest who abused me. He abused me at Annunciation School on Mass and Klingle in NW DC. He had absolute free reign to roam the halls unchallenged, and would stand in my classroom doorway staring at me until a teacher would allow him to take me out of class.
He was something of a Catholic superstar in the Archdiocese of Washington. He was also the Director of Catholic Charities and a fundraising powerhouse. I am a trained investigator for my former job, and I did some cursory digging into Montgomerys assignments and that turned out to be a hell of a rabbit hole.
Montgomery attended Mt. St Marys Seminary in Emmitsburg. The Baltimore Diocese is about to release their report, and that place is mentioned A LOT. That seminary turned out a TON of predators and comes up as something in common in the background of several predators in the Baltimore Diocese report. Years of accusations went ignored, and a lot of children were victimized as a result.
When I reported I was assured that the old ways of gaslighting, victim blaming, minimizing, and denials were a thing of the past, and that the church is dedicated to examining its sins of the past in a transparent way. What I have found in practice is entirely different, and today I am just fuming about it. The person who currently holds the report is Bishop Juan Esposito. He is the Moderator of the Curia for the Archdiocese of Washington and a graduate of Mt. St Marys Seminary. He was also the spiritual director there and a professor of Canon Law. A guy in charge with close ties to an institution that has turned out a ton of predators is not making me feel warm and fuzzy for sure.
This morning I tried to get some info from the Esposito's office and was told that they don't have the investigation report. A direct contradiction to what I was told a couple of months ago. When asked for clarification I was referred to their lawyer. So much for transparency. My last two emails to the lawyer have gone ignored, and no further answers from the Diocese. In DC, the folks in charge of releasing or not releasing the information contained in their reports are also people with close ties to institutions and people being investigated. Which brings me to the focus of my anger. In a normal investigation ethical people with ties to the investigated recuse themselves. That hasn't happened here and I think I know the reason. The diocese can't find anyone without ties. Abuse and coverup was SO prevalent that even today, they can't find anyone who can be truly impartial to do anything about it.
narmcharmsky t1_jeadqwa wrote
Thank your for your bravery. I cannot imagine experiencing all that and getting this immense slap in the face.