Submitted by Ok_Culture_3621 t3_1269cyj in washingtondc
Sujjin t1_je9rnr5 wrote
Surefinewhatever1111 t1_je9z8am wrote
A ward 6 parent is proof of nothing. That could just be chuckles sock puppet.
twenty-six-sixty-six t1_je9rxhm wrote
that isn't an example of congress foiling DC's attempts at improving schools
gravygrowinggreen t1_je9yah3 wrote
Hmm, seems you may have graduated from a school even worse than a DC public school.
I'll try small words.
1995: congress pass law. law make school hard and cost much to maintain for city. law passed by congress make school hard and cost much. congress interfere.
Did that help? If not, let me know, and I'm happy to work with whatever level of literacy you have achieved in life. We can try pictures!
twenty-six-sixty-six t1_je9yhj5 wrote
it's impressive that you wrote all this and still misinterpreted the article
Catch-a-RIIIDE t1_jea109r wrote
And yet, it's stated by the author to be one of the most intrusive examples of Congressional overreach in DC affairs.
Sure, it may not be Congress fucking with budgets and stuff today, but it's clearly laid out that this was Congress using it's unilateral authority in the only region it has it to test their own ideological education platforms (in this case Republicans and charter schools) at a high cost to the District and public education within it and with zero regard for results (because we're still here 28 years later talking about just how shitty DC schools are and Rs are still single-mindedly focused on charter schools as the fix it wasn't in DC).
It isn't the intent of the article that matters here, because Congressional interference to the detriment of DC public education is still the backdrop and even within two paragraphs is well established.
gravygrowinggreen t1_je9z0ji wrote
The article is saying that DC leaders should attempt to revisit the law. But the article is still about a law passed by congress that interferes with our education system.
Do you need the pictures?
twenty-six-sixty-six t1_je9z4ic wrote
yeah, please put some pictures together. ty
gravygrowinggreen t1_jea04wc wrote
twenty-six-sixty-six t1_jea0dtp wrote
didn't work for me, can you make a video
gravygrowinggreen t1_jea15ac wrote
No, sorry, I'm nearing the limit of my ability to talk down to you. It's just not fun anymore. I find you pitiable.
[deleted] t1_jea02yy wrote
[deleted]
gravygrowinggreen t1_jea10ul wrote
The 1995 law makes Administration of DC's many schools incredibly complex and expensive compared to a system with saner design. Charter schools/school choice/school vouchers, are all methods of looting public tax dollars for private individuals, and their presence in a school system in the long run makes things worse overall. While nothing directly leads from charter schools to turf fights on school grounds, the pervasive effects insure negative outcomes for society overall. In other words, systemic issues create numerous problems, many of which appear to not be directly related. Charter Schools aren't the sole or direct cause of your wife's experience, but it is a contributor.
[deleted] t1_jea30ba wrote
[deleted]
ZappBrannigasm t1_jeac2lj wrote
How do you think your anecdotal evidence helps describe the issue?
[deleted] t1_jeas7n2 wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments