0wed12
0wed12 t1_jae69te wrote
Reply to comment by S-192 in The U.S. needs more than the CHIPS Act to stay ahead of China: MIT report by Vailhem
I agree with you the quantity doesn't mean quality but that's why they use multiple methodology such as cited studies in others renowned journals, quotations in other research, impact factor of such study etc.
Bias still exist but this report is the most reliable to this date.
0wed12 t1_jadymbu wrote
Reply to comment by S-192 in The U.S. needs more than the CHIPS Act to stay ahead of China: MIT report by Vailhem
> They are, still, a mass production economy of low/medium tech
It was the case a decade ago, but not today, they are now a huge major hub for high end and deep tech industry.
Also the theft complain isn't so true anymore as some major peer reviewed reports pointed out that they are now the one publishing the most internationally cited studies.
https://www.science.org/content/article/china-rises-first-place-most-cited-papers
0wed12 t1_j2z1yyd wrote
Reply to [OC] The most popular websites in every country (excluding Google, YT, FB, other search engines and other inappropriate sites for a more insightful map) by giteam
Is reddit that popular? I don't know a single person browsing reddit regularly In my circle.
0wed12 t1_j29oqus wrote
Reply to comment by Zeduca in China's Huawei sees 'business as usual' as U.S. sanctions impact wanes by glawgii
They had in 2019 and 2020, but lose the market to others Android phones such as Xiaomi or OnePlus.
What I mean with my initial comment is that they still can sell their phones freely in other parts of the world.
0wed12 t1_j29nbcw wrote
Reply to comment by Zeduca in China's Huawei sees 'business as usual' as U.S. sanctions impact wanes by glawgii
Not only 1.4B people , Huawei is still available in Europe, Asia and about everywhere outside of the usa
0wed12 t1_iu9ngab wrote
Reply to comment by AlanzAlda in Federal bans aren't stopping US states from buying forbidden Chinese kit by Sorin61
Except it's not just number of research papers, but also the most cited papers through international systematic reviews or academic journals which is a good metric for quality.
https://www.science.org/content/article/china-rises-first-place-most-cited-papers
0wed12 t1_iu8m0c5 wrote
Reply to comment by DiggoryDug in Federal bans aren't stopping US states from buying forbidden Chinese kit by Sorin61
They are already superior in some techs like 5G, IA, biotechs and quantum computing.
People are coping if they think most of their technology is still just a 'copy' of american technology when even the US have not discovered it yet.
EDIT : Downvoting because it goes against your preconceived narrative won't change the facts btw.
0wed12 t1_iu8d1zq wrote
Reply to comment by -Bluedreams in Pressure mounts for regulators to investigate TikTok over potential 'Big Brother-type surveillance' after reports of plans to track Americans' locations by Lahampsink
From a non-american PoV, what's the difference between TikTok and Apple or Google who have their own privacy issues and have been caught selling your datas to the highest bidder?
americans are so conditionned to scapegoat their own problems to another country while their own privacy is as solid as a broken glass.
0wed12 t1_jd2vtbm wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Japanese leader heading to Ukraine for talks with Zelenskyy by Auburn_Value_1986
Most likely from a 3rd party since, Ukraine is also using Chinese drones and ammos btw