Airhostnyc
Airhostnyc t1_jdjl9o2 wrote
Reply to comment by SolitaryMarmot in NYC tenants report rampant housing discrimination by landlords over vouchers by DrogDrill
Not all vouchers are section 8. Section 8 also only pays 70%
Airhostnyc t1_jdiduzo wrote
Reply to comment by jamie030592 in NYC tenants report rampant housing discrimination by landlords over vouchers by DrogDrill
It’s not permanent in most cases. NYC had a similar programs a decade ago that scorned landlords as they stopped the program and was stuck with non paying tenants. Eviction takes up to a year in nyc housing court, that’s 12 months of unpaid rent.
Section 8 only covers 70% of the rent, the 30% has to be covered by tenant. Plus the endless bureaucracy that makes working with these programs a hassle. If people aren’t taking guaranteed money then there are obviously issues with the program.
Airhostnyc t1_jdidb5o wrote
Reply to comment by Metapod_Used_Hardon in NYC tenants report rampant housing discrimination by landlords over vouchers by DrogDrill
All nyc has to do is guarantee payment and also agree to paying for damages and eviction cost if necessary. If you had a choice would you a qualified applicant with no eviction records/job stability or an applicant with no job and housing voucher than can expire?
Airhostnyc t1_jcrepj0 wrote
Reply to comment by demonoid_admin in NYC Subway Fare over last 120 years adjusted for inflation by dust1990
Didn’t work long term lol
Airhostnyc t1_jci726a wrote
Reply to NYC has thousands of 3-K vacancies. City Council says that’s an outreach problem by Ok-Training-7587
Doubt outreach is the problem
Airhostnyc t1_jbey1y6 wrote
Reply to comment by Louis_Farizee in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
Lol I mean they kind of urinated on the law
Airhostnyc t1_jbeksbw wrote
Reply to comment by natekrinsky in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
Yes when the government tinkles with the laws to prevent reasonable profit and incentives, that happened. The MCI improvements are trash. Who is going to invest 20k and it takes 15 years to see that investment back. Putting 20k in the stock market will reap better rewards. Then add that these buildings won’t increase in value due to said laws. More and more you are going to hear about these buildings breaking down, they are old and require a lot of maintenance/repairs.
Even if you convert these buildings to condo’s/co-ops, how exactly will tenants used to paying $600 to $1200 a month. Take care of property taxes, maintenance and a loan? All these buildings will end up being the government’s problem aka taxpayers. As complaints start to roll in again.
Just look at any co-op/condo maintenance fees on old buildings…it’s a reason the condo board makes sure applicants are financially stable to take on ownership. You skip over that crucial part and over a few years…things will blow up.
Inflation is real, cost of goods/labor is real. These things don’t stay the same for life.
Airhostnyc t1_jbeid4o wrote
Reply to With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
The buildings where mortgages weren’t paid will end up in foreclosure. For these tenants, they will not get any repairs unless they do it themselves or the city comes in and make the repairs to add as a lien on the property. Foreclosures unfortunately take a long time but it’s obvious the owners gave up on the buildings. When there is no incentive they are just going to take the lost and move on.
Airhostnyc t1_jbei1k8 wrote
Reply to comment by bsanchey in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
The property will go back to the bank that own the loan. The owners stopped paying the mortgage on the loan. There isn’t no “taken” lol tenants will have to bid and buy from bank.
These are RS buildings so there is no expensive rent. If you read the article the owners bought pre2019 change in law most likely with the intention of doing buy outs and renovations to deregulate units. They can’t do that anymore so therefore it’s a useless investment.
Airhostnyc t1_jdo58yw wrote
Reply to comment by mowotlarx in If you build more public transit, they will come back by psychothumbs
Then they need to raise fares instead of trying to implement other taxes on non riders