Cfwydirk

Cfwydirk t1_jdty16j wrote

You are overthinking this. Do not buy a quality knife just to abuse it. You already know the abuse you give a utility knife dulls blades. The abuse will dull a quality knife blade just as quickly.

Buy a good knife for personal use and take care of it.

The beauty of a utility knife is brand new razor sharp blades cost $0.016 each. And if your knife is stolen you can replace it for $5.99 - $22.99.

https://www.acehardware.com/departments/tools/hand-tools/utility-and-hobby-knife-blades/20536?store=15338&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZLWgJz7_QIVXf_jBx32aQ7bEAQYAiABEgKDEfD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

Better yet, per suggestion of redditor F-21

Carbide Utility Blades stay 10 times sharper than traditional utility blades. The steel body helps to prevent breaking of the blade. https://www.authorizedtooloutlet.com/products/dewalt-dwht11131l-carbide-utility-blades-50-pack?variant=43358774460638&currency=USD&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=google+shopping&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI1OLL89n7_QIVbvbjBx2qVgbhEAQYAyABEgI7ZPD_BwE

https://www.acehardware.com/search?query=Utility+knife

5

Cfwydirk t1_j9vf39i wrote

There have been a few instances of such things but, they never tell you what happened to cause the craziness.

Such as was the contractor tasked to find a better way of doing this or that? Then, after analysis the old tried and true equipment or method of doing things was the best way causing the research cost being rolled into the cost of the item.

5

Cfwydirk t1_j9vdimz wrote

Smoke and mirrors. There is already a branch of government that fills that roll. Since 1921, the (General Accountability Office) has been serving the public. In that role. The politicians of both parties hold them on a leash and don’t have them audit all Federal programs as they should. “The work of the GAO is done at the request of congressional committees or subcommittees or is mandated by public laws or committee reports.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Accountability_Office

https://www.gao.gov/

7

Cfwydirk t1_j6lqlub wrote

They Don't Make 'Em Like They Used To: Are Old Appliances Better Than New Ones? They could, and they could be energy efficient.

https://www.homeserve.com/en-us/blog/home-improvement/old-appliances-vs-new-appliances/

And yes, we all know modern appliances are energy efficient. In the old days electricity was cheap.

A 20-year-old refrigerator could use 1,700 kWh of electricity every year, compared with about 450 kWh for a similarly sized new ENERGY STAR model. At an electrical cost of 12 cents per kWh, that represents a savings of $150 per year and a potential payback of about 7-9 years.

−1

Cfwydirk t1_j6l3jv2 wrote

Many things used to be near buy it for life. The terminology is still used in government economic reports. Appliances such as refrigerators, freezers, washers, dryers, dishwashers, stoves and more are still called “durable goods”. They sure were. Not any more. Today things are not built to last. They call that….

“planned obsolescence”

a policy of producing consumer goods that rapidly become obsolete and so require replacing, achieved by frequent changes in design, termination of the supply of spare parts, and the use of nondurable materials. =profit!

1