ChaosAE
ChaosAE t1_ja7wef6 wrote
Reply to after ASOIAF and kingkiller I dont dare to start reading unfinished series, I wonder statistically how much people are same and if it sffects other authors? by [deleted]
Same, I started Berserk in the middle of the boat arc.
ChaosAE t1_ja7w4x2 wrote
There is a comedy series on YouTube called If the emperor had a text to speech device that spends a fair bit of time poking fun at the worse parts of the Horus heresy. Basic premise is a way to talk with the emperor is found and he is just really pissed at what everyone has done since.
ChaosAE t1_j2aaz5w wrote
Reply to comment by That-Requirement-285 in 4chan /lit/'s 2022 top 100 books of all time by pizzapastamix
Even hitler thought it was shit if the forward is anything to go off
ChaosAE t1_ix8sk1y wrote
Reply to comment by Mr_niceguy0 in What is a great book with shitty sequels? by Mr_niceguy0
I would recommend it and maybe the second book. It did well enough to get a bad movie made
ChaosAE t1_ix8prow wrote
Reply to What is a great book with shitty sequels? by Mr_niceguy0
Inkheart
A rather fun fantasy story with a neat premise, someone can literally bring stories to life by reading them.
Won’t say it was amazing but was enjoyable. Sequels didn’t know what to do and eventually turned into characters going into stories they read, and it basically becomes discount Alice in wonderland from there imo.
ChaosAE t1_iu5vkh6 wrote
Reply to Why are books always changed or cut major scenes out when adapted to film? by hushpolocaps69
Couple of reasons, but to address Harry Potter in particular, those films were the result of several directors and began before all the books were written so things were ...inconsistent to say the least, some points were skipped and left later directors on a bind. One example is that in the books the first time Harry kills someone is a big deal for him emotionally, but this would make no sense in the film since it had him literally kill someone in the first movie.
More generally, some things don’t translate. Good luck literally adapting what is just internal monologs, or keeping pacing the same as a book that relied on long passages of detailed descriptions, or any story that won’t fit in a ~100min 3 act structure.
ChaosAE t1_itllthh wrote
Reply to comment by Jaedos in Just finished The Count of Monte Cristo by ComicsNBigBooks
It is really the children that make him the villain and is why he is written so well. Seeing it all we can understand his actions but he consciously destroys the lives of many innocent people just for his revenge.
ChaosAE t1_it7dgmx wrote
There are a few cases where I’d say the film was far better but also had little to do with the book.
Heart of Darkness/Apocalypse Now: Whole setting change and the movie production was an absolute shit show, but I’d say the final product outdoes the book by a lot.
Who Framed Rodger Rabbit: Literally has nothing to do with the book, turned a weird book into a revolutionary film for animation.
As for one where they are more comparable,
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas: I love them both, and I know Thompson didn’t care for the movie. But at the end of the day I think the film successful captured the district voice and tone the book has, and handled the ending a bit better than some of the more weird disjointed stuff at the end of the book.
ChaosAE t1_ja9kmh2 wrote
Reply to comment by StrawberryFields_ in My favourite Lovecraft stories so far (and recommendations for first time readers) by KamaandHallie
You are on Reddit, so yes you probably do