ChefGuru

ChefGuru t1_jefb47d wrote

With the advancement of technology, and the prevalence of cell phones, if it doesn't already exist, I'm sure it would be entirely possible to create an app that guides you directly to your seat. Or to be able to install scanners all over the place where you scan your ticket, and it tells you which way to go.

−2

ChefGuru t1_jef9kso wrote

Is this going to be like the cashier issue at fast food restaurants that's leading to automated kiosks being installed? There are signs all over the park, and I can find my own seat. I don't need an employee to demand to see my ticket, and simply point to where my seat is when I can already find it without their help.

−30

ChefGuru t1_j8xm3c5 wrote

You won't do it by simply removing a single type of tool from the people who want to do harm. How many guns did Timothy McVeigh use? How many guns did the Boston Marathon Bomber use? How many guns did the 9/11 hijackers use? How many guns did the truck driver use in Nice, France? How many guns were used in the deadliest school killing in US history?

When you have a compound fracture broken bone, it doesn't do any good to simply put a bandaid on the skin if you don't treat the cause. The single common denominator in EVERY murder, regardless of the type of weapon used, isn't a gun, it's the person who chose to harm someone else. If you don't treat the person, and the reason for wanting to harm others, you won't stop the killings.

0

ChefGuru t1_j8xcld8 wrote

It wasn't all muskets, back then. The first fully automatic firearm had already been invented when the 2nd Amendment was written. And despite Biden lying about the fact that citizens couldn't buy a cannon, back then, civilians could, in fact, purchase, own, and use weapons of war. Considering the government didn't originally want a standing military force, citizens had to have access to higher caliber weapons used in war.

−1

ChefGuru t1_j8xb74k wrote

I notice you had to add the keyword "legally", which kind of destroys the entire argument. Sure if you want to legally own and operate them... but then again, if you want to follow the law, you're not going to murder someone in the first place. It's estimated that 16% of drivers don't have a valid license, and that 13% don't have insurance. So even using the car argument, you're already admitting that around 1/6 of the people aren't following the laws, yet aren't stopped by the licensing "requirement." And that's also assuming that it's a 100% overlap of people with invalid licenses and no insurance, which isn't likely. And, once again, while you may need a special license in most cases to drive a "high caliber" vehicle, that's not always the case. There are a lot of people who own skoolie busses that can legally be driven with a regular license. I know 2 people, personally, who have one that I'd be able to jump right in and drive without needing any additional licensing or insurance.

Millions of people who legally and responsibly own guns are not the ones who are breaking the law to murder people, which is already illegal, so why do you think that adding more laws will suddenly make the people who are already not following the law want to follow them? Remember, Nice, France was a deadlier attack than any single mass shooting event in US history, and they already had the licensing and insurance requirements that you seem to think would prevent people from breaking the law.

Shit, why don't we just make murder illegal, because you seem to think that everyone will follow the laws.

They weren't making the comparison that you needed a legally owned and licensed vehicle to hit someone with a car, they were only stating that you simply needed one, and YOU are the one who added the extra step of legal ownership which screws up the argument. I've already pointed out that as many as 3/10 drivers aren't legally operating their vehicles, so it's entirely possible to operate one without proper requirements being met.

1

ChefGuru t1_j1lkeyb wrote

Even if you wanted to withhold rent, unless your rent is literally due tomorrow, or in the next couple of days, it's not going to matter. You have to allow a landlord a reasonable amount of time to diagnose and fix an issue before you can withhold rent, and it sounds like they're already working on it. This weather has caused issues for a shitload of people, and I'm sure the repair guys are swamped, right now, so most people aren't going to be able to get things fixed the same day.

Instead of trying to learn how to threaten to withhold rent, why don't you try asking your landlord to get you some space heaters since the radiators aren't working? You've already admitted that they've acknowledged the issue, and are working to get it repaired.

13