Chiperoni
Chiperoni t1_je51ggf wrote
Reply to comment by ReturnToCrab in Do most animals have to worry about complications from cannibalization? by StressfulRiceball
We have tons of PrP^wt of which it is very rare for one to become PrP^sc . If PrP^sc forms it's estimated to take around a decade to kill, at least in humans.
Chiperoni t1_je515ou wrote
Reply to comment by amaurea in Do most animals have to worry about complications from cannibalization? by StressfulRiceball
As far as we can tell, you can't fix a misshapen PrP (aka prion). Those "prions" in the paper you are referencing are yeast proteins that have distinct conformations that can propagate like human prions. All humans have tons of PrP but it's rare for one to become a prion. However, once one does it can start a chain reaction.
Chiperoni t1_je1fg4h wrote
I SEE NO BEAR
Chiperoni t1_jckugk7 wrote
Reply to How would a scientist be able to tell the difference between a blood sample from two totally different animals? by EastClintwood89
You can also pop the cells, collect DNA (from white and red cell precursors and others since mature RBCs don't have it), and sequence it. Then you can compare it to existing databases and chances are you can find a match.
Chiperoni t1_jcblmh0 wrote
Reply to Malformations in heart, eyes and nervous system: Nano-plastics disrupt growth by giuliomagnifico
Not saying microplastics are good, they most certainly are not, but the title is alarmist. They used levels way more than a person would be exposed to and introduced them directly into chicken embryos. I'd think you'd get malformations with tons of seemingly innocuous things at high concentrations.
Chiperoni t1_ja93rwy wrote
Reply to comment by Cunninghams_right in How the US and Canada Reduced Their Power Sector Emissions: Top Source of Electricity in Each State and Province Since 2005 [OC] by NoComplaint1281
Yeah but Iowa has hella corn so I think in this instance it probably is.
Chiperoni t1_ja8e63i wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in How the US and Canada Reduced Their Power Sector Emissions: Top Source of Electricity in Each State and Province Since 2005 [OC] by NoComplaint1281
Just moved to Iowa and am pleasantly surprised by all the wind energy and ethanol-including gas.
Chiperoni t1_j9ztjfl wrote
Reply to Would two people who look identical but who are not related have similar matching DNA? by OhMyThiccThighs
Not in the sense I think you mean. Most physical characteristics are polygenic meaning different combinations of genes are interacting to give off a phenotype. So there's countless other combinations that can yield the same result. Even genes that are linked in all cases like blue eyes can have DNA changes at many different spots. Also outside of nature there is the just as important nurture.
Chiperoni t1_j8szsie wrote
Reply to This electric toothbrush plays “Survivor” by Destiny’s Child while you brush your teeth by pervertedgiant
I only brush to Chip Skylark thank you very much.
Chiperoni t1_j6x8hrq wrote
Reply to comment by Decapod73 in I'm (m) 31 years old from Germany and am dying of germ cell cancer! AMA by Reiiser
Boo. Yeah looks like only non-medical companies still manufacture it. It has shown efficacy in metastatic testicular disease though. Also prostate cancer and Ewing sarcoma.
Chiperoni t1_j6x0th5 wrote
Have you heard about plicamycin? It has some historical success for testicular germ cells. Not approved in US but maybe Germany. It fell out fashion after platinum drugs were developed.
Chiperoni t1_j664dqn wrote
Reply to comment by macross1984 in Chubby chinchilla by GoldenChinchilla
Probably not. Likely 80% of that volume is fur.
Chiperoni t1_j24ymqx wrote
Reply to comment by benhereforawhile in Is there a name for the TV trope when a character is stupid/silly but they become the straight man in episodes alongside a stupider character? by 3kool5you
That’s a perfect episode.
Chiperoni t1_j20l596 wrote
Reply to comment by expo1001 in Scientists develop blood test for Alzheimer’s disease by grab-n-g0
This isn’t based on amyloid beta…
Chiperoni t1_j0ux1q9 wrote
Reply to comment by Apollon1212 in [OC] We Tried and Ranked EVERY pizza in our city (MONCTON NB, CANADA) by ReelDeadOne
I know! This is ridiculous. Don’t they know that the inside of your cheeks are very sensitive? It's like the inside of your thighs except with a tongue.
Chiperoni t1_ixzsif3 wrote
Reply to comment by PeanutBrittle55 in A 100 sided die by DerMagicSheep
Rooooooooxane
Chiperoni t1_ix4wkyw wrote
I can feel the humidity through my phone.
Chiperoni t1_iw61cb4 wrote
Reply to comment by bluesquare2543 in How do medical researchers obtain lab animals with diseases like specific forms of cancer which arise spontaneously? Do they raise thousands of apes and hope some eventually develop the disease? by userbrn1
To Crispr edit you need two things. One is an enzyme known as Cas. Cas’ job is to cut DNA. The other is a piece of DNA you manufacture. In the simplest terms, one piece of the dna binds Cas and the other binds the DNA of the target. When you combine both parts you create a little homing missile that binds the target so that Cas can make a cut. Now there’s a whole bunch of neat tricks you can do but the simplest are either to make a mutation or add DNA.
Just by having Cas at the target, the DNA will keep getting cut and the cell will repair it. Until it doesn’t because it makes an error. Then because your manufactured DNA doesn’t match the target perfectly it dissociates and Cas stops cutting. Now you have a missense, silent, frameshift, deletion, or nonsense mutation.
Alternatively, while Cas cuts you can also add more DNA that matches the DNA around the target with the hope that when the cell repairs the DNA and that this new DNA sneaks in. Now you have an insertion.
Again lots of little tricks you can do. For example let’s say you want to mutate a protein important in heart muscle. You can literally use CRISPR to insert an artificial gene that is only expressed in the heart by sticking close to a gene sequence that is only expressed in heart. Then you can actually CRISPR in the Cas protein but in a way that it’s only turned on when exposed to a chemical like the chemo drug tamoxifen. So you can grow normal mice and then at whatever point you like expose them to tamoxifen which turns on Cas. This Cas will then only have an effect on your original gene target only in the heart because the artificial DNA sequence you added is only expressed there. Really the possibilities are endless.
Chiperoni t1_iw4rij6 wrote
Reply to comment by brutal_one in How do medical researchers obtain lab animals with diseases like specific forms of cancer which arise spontaneously? Do they raise thousands of apes and hope some eventually develop the disease? by userbrn1
A very niche market but yeah. Check out jax.org. (This is in no way a sponsorship)
Chiperoni t1_iw3xl5a wrote
Reply to comment by Agood10 in How do medical researchers obtain lab animals with diseases like specific forms of cancer which arise spontaneously? Do they raise thousands of apes and hope some eventually develop the disease? by userbrn1
You might be right that their numbers are stable or increased but if you compare researchers that work on NHP to all other animal models or even just mice, they are a drop in the bucket
Chiperoni t1_iw3452f wrote
Reply to comment by Allchemyst in How do medical researchers obtain lab animals with diseases like specific forms of cancer which arise spontaneously? Do they raise thousands of apes and hope some eventually develop the disease? by userbrn1
Very true. And ideally a “mother” stock of the original tumor or cell line can be stored and expanded when needed if you want to reproduce the same tumor.
Chiperoni t1_iw32elo wrote
Reply to comment by Cersad in How do medical researchers obtain lab animals with diseases like specific forms of cancer which arise spontaneously? Do they raise thousands of apes and hope some eventually develop the disease? by userbrn1
Oh definitely feasible. We already do it on human cells and even have done it on human embryos. As long as we have the genome sequenced. I just meant more and more people are stepping away from primate research due to ethics and practicality.
Chiperoni t1_iw2x410 wrote
Reply to How do medical researchers obtain lab animals with diseases like specific forms of cancer which arise spontaneously? Do they raise thousands of apes and hope some eventually develop the disease? by userbrn1
Almost nobody works with primates anymore and we don’t really do transgenic primates. For lots of animals we do. Mice are the “work horse” for genetic models. Fruit flies, and rats, and zebrafish to some extent too (and yes others). Yes we can breed colonies with specific traits. Then we keep inbreeding them to keep their mutations. That’s like the old school way.
Then came things like the Cre-Lox system. You can use bacteria to make a bunch of DNA with specific sequences that include sites where it can be cut. You can add it to an embryo and have these DNA sequences integrate at specific sites by making the DNA sequence the same as where you want it integrated because every strand of DNA has a complement. You can then cause specific mutations at these sites as an embryo or even in a way you can trigger with chemicals so that the mutation can be triggered at any time at specific tissues. Then you can maintain a colony with inbreeding.
Now the new, new way is to use CRISPR which lets you do this much more consistently with a lot less effort. Then you can inbreed to maintain a colony.
Chiperoni t1_iqx0136 wrote
If I was a giant and ate a scoop you know it would taste like an Andes Mint.
Chiperoni t1_jeav6ji wrote
Reply to [OC] Please welcome my new best friend Bitey) by LanaDreamy
Like the dashkin?