CivilInspector4

CivilInspector4 t1_jdj3rna wrote

It's one dude who clearly does not give a shit about Jews, black people, hate crimes etc... But is arguing about subjective terminology used to describe the suspect. You can see from his other posts on Reddit he is a deranged Trumper who is directly biased/racist towards black people as well

Personally I think people like that are mentally unhinged and project a lot of crazy ideas they have on everyone else (ie "you are all obsessed with race not me!!"), so it's best to ignore or block them

5

CivilInspector4 t1_j71uiod wrote

>This is also a bit of a misleading headline. DiBlasio pushed corporation counsel and comptroller to settle cases at an unprecedented rate, regardless of the merit. Years past, City would actively defend lawsuits.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2022/police-misconduct-insurance-settlements-reform/

It's really silly to think this is a big bird issue. The city also paid out more money ten years ago

https://www.silive.com/news/2014/08/public_advocates_office_propos.html

2

CivilInspector4 t1_j6zv7cw wrote

>Then claiming the cops are going to “riot” with even the mildest reform, citing something from 30 years ago, when we HAVE had many instances of mild reform in the past decade or so (body cameras, discovery law changes, bans on chokeholds, and the list goes on), and that was not the case.

With the benefit of hindsight it's interesting to see conservatives and law enforcement advocates battle almost every step of reform, yet the results are obviously producing justice for victims of police brutality

https://www.nycpba.org/press-releases/2020/nyc-pba-statement-on-50-a-repeal/

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/09/nyregion/new-york-police-union-body-camera-lawsuit.html

https://www.silive.com/news/2014/08/public_advocates_office_propos.html

−1