Corrupted_G_nome

Corrupted_G_nome t1_iwvigdt wrote

Humans actually have dominant eyes like dominant hands. Its hard to notice unless there is a case like yours. People who have different prescriptions per eye with glasses have two different images depending which eye is dominant in that moment. Closing one eye over the other I have different levels of clarity/blurryness but when both are open the default is my dominant eye's prescription.

To test a peson can hold their arm out stright forward then close one eye or the other. One eye when closed will cause the image to shift and the other eye when switched will show your arm where it is when both eyes are open.

3

Corrupted_G_nome t1_iujwffh wrote

Animals get that trait for free which is why chimps appear stronger than people. In rare circumstances that brainwave is also accessable to humans. There are recorded instances of mothers lifting heavy objects like cars to save their children but were unable to repeat the act for reporters. In desperate enough times the pain sensors turn off and you can literally shatter yourself but have access to all your power.

1

Corrupted_G_nome t1_iujvzno wrote

Yeah meat and bone is meat and bone. Chicken bones are more hollow and less dense so the conparison is slightly off. Anything you can damage on a plate with your teeth you could pull off IRL. A raw pork chop and human flesh are esentially tye same.

When the brain switches brainwaves we can access all of our strength. Ive worked with apes and they don't seem to really notice or care when they bite something so hard their teeth fall out. Not even enough to condition then to stop at a future interaction.

0

Corrupted_G_nome t1_iujvjzv wrote

Im notsure about those figures but alpha and gamma brain patterns are at play.

Chimps can use all of their strength all the time (Gamma I think), however they never slow down and think like we do.

Whereas humans are almost always in Alpha brain mode. The opposite of other Apes. So when we switch modes we get the heroc stories of a mom lifting a car to save a trapped child and the like. Some feats of athleticism and strength are only attainable when the brain switches off those self preservation mechanisms.

I worked with small apes and they would frequently attack the leather gloves with such ferocity their teeth would fall out. They hardly seemed to notice if at all and certainly did not seem to care.

1

Corrupted_G_nome t1_it74m2e wrote

Some people said some things so I will add. Safety, beavers enjoy steams and pond usually smaller than ones sturgeons live in. Past that they have no aquatic predators. Big ponds keep the wolves and cyotes further away.

Some said underwater entrance.

Another is winter rafts. They will construct piles of wood so that fresh twigs and leaves are below the surface before winter. So along with digging for roots and hibernating fish they can enjoy fresh sticks and leaves. A larger pond means more access to submerged food sources, their preference.

2

Corrupted_G_nome t1_ir6feif wrote

Nope, if it returns to solid at room temperature its semi solid inside you and can lead to health issues over a long term. Trans fats do resolidify.

People seem to think animals have some magical quality that makes them different. The cow got its fats (and proteins) from plants. Its made of the same stuff as you or I and we basically synthesize the same nutrients. Other than insoluble fiber that ruminants have a yeast ally to break down your building blocks and its building nlocks are made of the same stuff.

1

Corrupted_G_nome t1_ir567wd wrote

Thats not what the data shows. Fitness is not equal to health, one cannot see clogging arteries or excess fat on the heart.

Obviously being active and working out is healthy.

One can also smoke a pack of cigs a day and drink whisky and never work out and be healthy for decades. Observation is not data. Correlation can be positively correlated otherwise thats just whataboutism one could say for anything. But is gravity really due to mass? Correlation is not causality. Like please, thats a bad faith argument.

−1

Corrupted_G_nome t1_ir55xkn wrote

Blue zones is referring to a study.

Its recommended by many countries health associations including the US, Canada and the WHO. Both government and NGO seem to come to the same findings. Limited meat diets are better than high in meat diets. Im not sure the same rigor goes into studying vegan or vegetarian diets.

I thibk just less fat and less salt typically found in cheap meat is bad for the heart.

2

Corrupted_G_nome t1_ir55mnd wrote

Sure the US department of health. The Heart and Stroke foundation. The new Canadian food guide. The WHO recommends it too.

So its common knowledge and generally accepted and provable via science. The reason is simple, trans fats and salts. People simply eat far too much and get sick.

Blue zones were discovered through study so that is its own datum.

1

Corrupted_G_nome t1_ir3fccg wrote

Its a western thing. Unfortunately sometimes other cultures immitate it and the results are becomming wide spread.

The heathiest people eat meat occasionally amd on holidays (blue zones! They do light but regular labor and don't have access to highways. Their economies are slow and the folks who live lingest are women taking care of many grandkids.

Keep busy and keep communities close and do everything but in moderation. Slow down and relax and you may just live forever.

−7