DeadwoodNative

DeadwoodNative t1_j3xqfzl wrote

would def be interesting to study feasibility based on recent and changing patterns, but it seems every year or 2 there’s serious flooding somewhere in the state.

and if the reports are true about exorbitant water allocated to almond growing… a gallon per nut or whatever; I like almonds but that’s ridiculous

5

DeadwoodNative t1_j3xpoxo wrote

Totally agree 100% They def dropped the ball there. Guessing some of it was ‘NIMBY’. Know the costs were gonna be ridiculous. That is def one area CA needs to pull there head out and deregulate a bit. Maher had a horror story of like 4 yrs to get his solar plans approved and built. There was a big story of proposals to build temp transitional housing to ease homeless fiasco, and it was like the price of a luxury apt per unit. Come fucking on! I’ve also heard disposal of salt byproduct would be a nightmare. Almost seems harnessing their reappearing ‘atmospheric river’ would be just as ‘easy’

−2

DeadwoodNative t1_j3x8jg6 wrote

There aren’t many things I agree with GOP Governors about; but I honestly can’t blame them for this. I’m all for immigration but it needs to be orderly and legal. And I think too many liberals (which I am) are blind to the impact of runaway undocumented migrants. It is not racial! I am white, but literally more than half my best friends growing up, and many many today, are hispanic.

4

DeadwoodNative t1_j3x5plz wrote

This may be a stupid question, but are there expanded/enhanced statewide efforts in California to collect and divert flood waters to reservoirs? I know you can’t easily control flood waters but with all the resources and technology and brain power of that state, I’ve never heard of any brilliant collection diversion efforts. For instance I read a few months ago they plan on covering canals to lessen solar evaporation, covering them with solar panels to also generate energy. Sounds like a genius win/win. Any genius collection efforts?

5